In today’s world of advanced science and technology, we still greatly value our artists such as musicians, painters and writers. What can arts tell us about life that science and technology cannot?
It is incontrovertible that in society’s integration and the profound effects of disruptive technologies has had a impact on life aspects, in other words, science and technology serve as an indispensable means to convey a huge amount of information to everyone. Nevertheless, arts play also a vital role in life aspects that the former and the latter cannot do it. The works of art such as historical picture, depicting a starvation and difficult situation. Ones’s cultural and traditional traits impart the knowledge such as solodarity and humility to inhabitants.
To begin with, it has been widely demonstrated that the works of literature, historical images or music express true-to-life stories such as a starvation or toughest stages during the war period. Additionally, on behalf of a citizen in Viet Nam, my country, the works of art in the museums, I comprehend the pain of parent via some pictures. In orther words, arts can tell us about life aspect that science and technology cannot. A good example of this is my family. We visited the enormous museum in Viet Nam, which displays a huge quantity of historical works, depicting death’s reason in the past. This result in appreciating what we have and being closer in our family.
It can be said without exaggeration that the works of art express obviously about cultural and traditional properties of their own country such us modesty and solidarity. In reality, the possession of those traits plays a crucial role in people over the world in general and youth’s generation in particulat. This can be evidenced by vietnamese people in the protection from covid-19. The solidarity help to prevent effectively from infectious disease and restrict fatal cases. As a consequence, the works of art are of necessity for life that science and technology cannot.
In conclusion, the disruptive technology is extraordinarily crucial in today’s world, but arts play an equally vital in life.
- Some people think that newly built houses should follow the style of old houses in local areas Others think that people should have freedom to build houses of their own style Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 73
- Some people think the government funding should not be used for supporting art and culture while others think supporting cultural activities may be beneficial for the population and the culture Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 73
- Education for young people is important in many countris However the others think government should spend more money for education in adult population who cannot read and write To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- Organized tour to remote areas and community is increasingly popular Is it a positive or negative development for the local people and the environment 73
- People living in large cities today face many problems in their everyday life What are these problems Should governments encourage people to move to smaller regional towns 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 114, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...ects of disruptive technologies has had a impact on life aspects, in other words,...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, nevertheless, so, in conclusion, in general, such as, in other words, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1643.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 316.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.19936708861 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21620550194 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.1308121723 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.556962025316 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 517.5 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.9639839301 49.4020404114 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.6875 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.75 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.125 7.06120827912 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.323168769766 0.244688304435 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100327946917 0.084324248473 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.114225036896 0.0667982634062 171% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.194455924088 0.151304729494 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0136073926087 0.056905535591 24% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.88 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.08 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.