Topic: Some people think that using mobile phones and computers has a negative effect on young people's reading and writing skills. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
While concerns have been raised about the potential negative impact of mobile phones and computers on young people's literacy skills, I respectfully disagree with this notion. In fact, I believe that these technological tools can enhance reading and writing skills when used appropriately and constructively.
First and foremost, the accessibility to a vast array of digital resources has expanded young people's opportunities for reading and writing. Mobile phones and computers provide access to countless online books, articles, and educational materials, fostering a reading culture among the youth. For instance, e-books and audiobooks available on platforms like Kindle and Audible have enabled young individuals to explore various genres and discover new authors, thereby cultivating a lifelong love for reading.
Additionally, the internet and social media platforms facilitate global communication and collaboration, offering young people countless opportunities to practice and develop their writing skills. Through blogs, online forums, and social networking sites, young people can express their thoughts and opinions, engage in meaningful discussions, and receive feedback on their writing. This interactive process encourages them to refine their writing style, improve their grammar and punctuation, and expand their vocabulary.
Moreover, numerous educational tools and applications available on mobile phones and computers provide tailored support to improve reading and writing abilities. These platforms often incorporate gamification elements and personalized learning strategies, making the process more engaging and motivating for young learners. For example, applications like Grammarly and Duolingo offer instant feedback on writing and language skills, assisting young people in honing their competencies and overcoming challenges.
However, it is crucial to acknowledge that the potential benefits of mobile phones and computers largely depend on their responsible usage. Parents, educators, and young individuals themselves should monitor screen time and ensure that these devices are used constructively for learning and personal development rather than as mere distractions.
In conclusion, when utilized responsibly and effectively, mobile phones and computers can positively impact young people's reading and writing skills. By providing access to an abundance of digital resources, facilitating global communication, and offering personalized learning tools, these technological devices can significantly contribute to developing literacy skills among young individuals.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-05-18 | lalo | 56 | view |
| 2023-11-14 | wholemilk | 84 | view |
| 2023-06-23 | hieu13092006 | 89 | view |
| 2023-05-18 | jessie7777 | 84 | view |
| 2023-05-17 | wholemilk | 73 | view |
- 18 02 2023 New technologies have changed the way children spend their free time Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 89
- While it is believed that making a profit is a top priority of many organizations since it helps their businesses to stay afloat and keep their activities running smoothly others argue that they should also have to take social responsibilities aside from 84
- In some parts of the world traditional festivals and celebrations have disappeared or are disappearing What problems is this causing What measures could be taken to counter this situation 65
- High school students are usually not good at managing money What are the reasons What are the solutions 89
- Nowadays celebrities are more famous for their glamour and wealth than for their achievements and this sets a bad example to young people To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, moreover, so, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 13.1623246493 23% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 34.0 10.4138276553 326% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2253.0 1615.20841683 139% => OK
No of words: 352.0 315.596192385 112% => OK
Chars per words: 6.40056818182 5.12529762239 125% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33147354134 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08600541627 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.571022727273 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 698.4 506.74238477 138% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 2.0 1.60771543086 124% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 0.809619238477 741% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.0437201336 49.4020404114 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 150.2 106.682146367 141% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4666666667 20.7667163134 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.33333333333 7.06120827912 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.38176352705 137% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.279707892984 0.244688304435 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104252826066 0.084324248473 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0700497329883 0.0667982634062 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.160243721144 0.151304729494 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0626895450636 0.056905535591 110% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.4 13.0946893788 156% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 14.29 50.2224549098 28% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.0 11.3001002004 150% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 20.14 12.4159519038 162% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.88 8.58950901804 127% => OK
difficult_words: 136.0 78.4519038076 173% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.