The treat of nuclear power weapons maintains world peace. Nuclear power provides cheap and clean energy. The benefits of nuclear technology far outweigh the disadvantages. To what extent do you agree or disagree
Currently, nuclear power is an innovation of the modern science. It is the key source of nuclear weapons. Nuclear power provides cheap and clean energy. It can be the most efficient alternative to fuel, electricity, and other types of energy. Therefore a lot of people believe that nuclear technology has more positive sides than its negatives. I personally disagree with the statement and the following essay will discuss in details about it.
First and foremost, many of the first world countries have achieved the nuclear power and have become a superpower. It can initially seem that mono-polarization of nuclear power preserves world peace but the idea is not agreeable always. if it goes into destructive hands, would be devastating enough to wipe off an entire city in minutes. The two cities of Japan namely Hiroshima and Nagasaki, destroyed during the Second World War can be taken as examples.
Second, It is very much true that nuclear power is an alternative and perhaps the most efficient source of energy during these days of the energy crisis. However, nuclear power needs the utmost and very careful handling, in the case of any indulgence, or any misuse can cause a huge loss of life and property. The history tells us how the weapons have destroyed millions of lives and have caused severe damage to our environment.
In conclusion, although nuclear technology could be used as a clean and cheap source of energy, I strongly disagree with it. So we must use it for our betterment, not for our destruction.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-05 | Molla Md Rezaul Karim | 73 | view |
| 2023-08-05 | ÁNH HANDSOME | view | |
| 2022-09-16 | Luisjackiet | 78 | view |
| 2022-09-08 | Luisjackiet | 61 | view |
| 2022-08-28 | tungpham | 73 | view |
- The tendency of news reports in the media to focus more on problems and emergencies than on positive developments is harmful to the individuals and the society as a whole To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- Many people say the gap between rich and poor people is wider as rich people become richer and poor people grow poorer What problems could this situation cause and what measures can be done to address those problems 78
- Some people regard video games as harmless fun or even as a useful educational tool Others however believe that video games are having an adverse effect on the people who play them In your opinion do the drawbacks of video games outweigh the benefits 73
- There are an increasing number of people who do not know their neighbours What causes this situation How to solve it 67
- Social and modern trends are difficult to follow these days and it s widely believed that they primarily exist just to make the living more colorful especially online Some people believe that we shouldn t follow them and that we should live in what we are 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 245, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...electricity, and other types of energy. Therefore a lot of people believe that nuclear te...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 231, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[3]
Message: The adverb 'always' is usually not used at the end of a sentence.
...rld peace but the idea is not agreeable always. if it goes into destructive hands, wou...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 239, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: If
...e but the idea is not agreeable always. if it goes into destructive hands, would b...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, second, so, therefore, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 41.998997996 64% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1279.0 1615.20841683 79% => OK
No of words: 256.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.99609375 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76566637946 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 176.041082164 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.5859375 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 412.2 506.74238477 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.8049306068 49.4020404114 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.2666666667 106.682146367 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0666666667 20.7667163134 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.06666666667 7.06120827912 58% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.330592307518 0.244688304435 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.120257406788 0.084324248473 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.113015609624 0.0667982634062 169% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.189928360545 0.151304729494 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0603637070176 0.056905535591 106% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 13.0946893788 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.42 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.43 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 78.4519038076 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.