using the social network as a learning instruction in the middle of pandemic

Essay topics:

using the social network as a learning instruction in the middle of pandemic

Nowadays, most of the learning activities are carrying out via the Internet since the broken out of the pandemic. Using the online software or the social network, particularly is Facebook, as an instruction may bring both advantages and disadvantages.
Firstly, considering the pros of using Facebook as an educational instruction. We cannot deny that Facebook is one of the most popular social networks in the world. Therefore, we can take advantage of it to impart the lesson of study to the students effectively. The lecture could convey the instructions or the assignments to their students immediately via using Facebook. Moreover, Facebook would be a wonderful assistant for the connection between the lectures and their students. Besides, Facebook permits the accounters to gather a group of members to message or video call to catch up on the latest lessons.
Nevertheless, Facebook is a social network, so it exists some of the cons if we suppose it as an educational instruction. The main property of Facebook is the connection, it is used for making friends and updating their sharing. If we use Facebook to impart the lesson would not be miraculous as the other software like Zoom. On Facebook, the lecture could gather a group of members, but the number of them is limited; on Zoom, they can meet face-to-face with among 100+ students at once. Moreover, the lecture even could check the attendance easier if they use Zoom, this activity seems to be more difficult to handle on Facebook. As a result, we could use Facebook only to keep in touch with the lecture or to discuss the lesson with others, not use for learning face-to-face.
In conclusion, we cannot avoid using social network like Facebook to apply for studying in the middle of the pandemic as today. All of us can familiarize ourselves to study effectively, no matter the software is good or bad, the matter is the way we use it and our awareness about self-study.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-10-01 dngoc0404 80 view
2023-07-23 trung8a208 61 view
2023-04-27 Selena17_ 61 view
2023-03-05 tergeo 80 view
2022-12-12 mary.ssherr 67 view

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ing both advantages and disadvantages. Firstly, considering the pros of using F...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ll to catch up on the latest lessons. Nevertheless, Facebook is a social netwo...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 68, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...ebook is a social network, so it exists some of the cons if we suppose it as an educational...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 240, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ing friends and updating their sharing. If we use Facebook to impart the lesson wo...
^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s, not use for learning face-to-face. In conclusion, we cannot avoid using soc...
^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, first, firstly, if, may, moreover, nevertheless, so, therefore, as to, in conclusion, as a result

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 7.30460921844 14% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1617.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 327.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94495412844 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25242769721 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92110245417 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.504587155963 0.561755894193 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 513.9 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 24.7988785029 49.4020404114 50% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 101.0625 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4375 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.9375 7.06120827912 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.259860021269 0.244688304435 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0905956237147 0.084324248473 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0921551326497 0.0667982634062 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.178356846347 0.151304729494 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0524940714222 0.056905535591 92% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.37 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.35 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.