Vietnam society has changed significantly in the past few decades. However, a lot of traditional values have been lost, which is a pity. Do you agree or disagree with this statement?
When globalization takes place in many different ways and brings profound changes in people’s life, it is often said that Vietnam has lost its traditional culture, which definitely exert a negative impact on the sustainable development of the country. However, to my view, I totally disagree with this statement.
Initially, Vietnamese culture reflected by different aspects: religion, art, festivals, clothes has been apparently protected and stimulated by both the individuals and the government. Long standing values have been kept within generations in family and in the society when a lot of traditional events, holidays have been held annually and attracted high attendances. Furthermore, there is no denying that the traditional culture plays a crucial part in a lot of industries in Vietnam, which gives rise to the socio economic development of the country. For example, the authority promotes cultural tourism as an efficacious way to preserve, take pride in our cultural identity and bring the national image to the international stage. Not only tourism but also the fashion industry has been developed significantly on the basis of our national clothes.
Apart from that, the eradication of some traditional practices is an inexorable part in the development of an advanced culture deeply imbued with national identity. First and foremost, it is crucial to erase some obsolete, superstitious beliefs or lifestyles especially in some ethnic minorities which not only negatively influence people’s life but also hold back the socio economic development of the whole country. In addition, there have been some traditional practices which are not totally bad, formed by the long standing habits and lifestyle of the locals but inappropriate in the modern life, causing a lot of issues to the society. Therefore, some proactive measures including raising people’s awareness and enacting laws should be taken to obliterate these customs. In general, the elimination of some practices is highly likely to make contribution to create a more civilized society.
To sum up, I believe a lot of cultural heritages have still plays an integral part in Vietnamese spiritual life and also laid a firm foundation to the sustainable development of our country.
- Does nature or nurture form a person 's personality? 78
- In the future students may have the choice of studying at home by using technology such as computers or television or of studying at traditional school Which would you prefer 89
- Doing volunteer work is a waste of time and shouldn t be encouraged among students Do you agree or disagree with this idea 93
- In the future, students will have the choice of studying at home by using technology such as computers or television of studying at traditional schools. What would you prefer? 84
- Some universities now offer their courses on the Internet so that people can study online. Is this a positive or negative development? 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 35, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
When globalization takes place in many different ways and brings profound changes in peo...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, first, furthermore, however, if, so, still, therefore, apart from, for example, in addition, in general, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1931.0 1615.20841683 120% => OK
No of words: 351.0 315.596192385 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.50142450142 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32839392791 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12112130539 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.561253561254 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 630.9 506.74238477 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 53.4654674815 49.4020404114 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 148.538461538 106.682146367 139% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.0 20.7667163134 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.5384615385 7.06120827912 149% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.208292788779 0.244688304435 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0763009841816 0.084324248473 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0742289671428 0.0667982634062 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125156634484 0.151304729494 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0676620633567 0.056905535591 119% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.0 13.0946893788 137% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 27.15 50.2224549098 54% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 11.3001002004 143% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.92 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.97 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 78.4519038076 141% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.78957915832 158% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.