While many people go to university for academic study, more people should be encouraged to do vocational training because there is a lack of qualified workers such as electricians and plumbers. Agree or disagree
In today's world, where the demand for higher academic education is increasing, there is an ongoing debate about whether more people should opt for job-related training to strengthen the workforce or pursue further academic study. While some argue that vocational training is necessary, I firmly believe that seeking higher academic education is the best option.
On the one hand, it is believed that vocational training can fill the missing spots of blue-collar workers and create an easier career path for students. Firstly, the lack of a manual labor force has become a persistent problem in many developed countries, and vocational training can help address this issue. Secondly, students who are not suited for academic study can benefit from vocational programs as they are more approachable and require less skill.
On the other hand, I believe that the benefits of higher academic learning far outweigh those of vocational programs. This is because jobs such as doctors, engineers, and teachers, which require a certain certification or diploma, are in high demand and highly respected. Encouraging students to apply to universities is the solution to meet these demands. Moreover, with the rise of technology, traditional jobs are being replaced by robots and smart artificial intelligence, making vocational training unnecessary.
In conclusion, while vocational training can help in addressing the current economic struggles, the merits of higher academic learning surpass those of vocational programs. Pursuing academic study can provide students with more job opportunities and a better future. Therefore, I strongly believe that people should opt for higher academic education to strengthen the workforce and ensure their future success.
- An American film actor once said Tomorrow is important and precious Some people think individuals and society should pay more attention to the future than to the present Do you agree or disagree 56
- Some people believe that developments in the field of artificial intelligence will have a positive impact on our lives in the near future Others by contrast are worried that we are not prepared for a world in which computers are more intelligent than huma 84
- While many people go to university for academic study more people should be encouraged to do vocational training because there is a lack of qualified workers such as electricians and plumbers Agree or disagree 56
- While many people go to university for academic study more people should be encouraged to do vocational training because there is a lack of qualified workers such as electricians and plumbers Agree or disagree 84
- While many people go to university for academic study more people should be encouraged to do vocational training because there is a lack of qualified workers such as electricians and plumbers Agree or disagree 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 169, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'strengthening'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'train' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: strengthening
...ple should opt for job-related training to strengthen the workforce or pursue further academi...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 136, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to surpass'
Suggestion: to surpass
... the merits of higher academic learning surpass those of vocational programs. Pursuing ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, while, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 41.998997996 57% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1489.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 265.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.61886792453 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03470204552 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87854537847 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.581132075472 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 467.1 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.079387775 49.4020404114 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.083333333 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0833333333 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.75 7.06120827912 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.304701422228 0.244688304435 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104310023771 0.084324248473 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0367803883054 0.0667982634062 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.181972266475 0.151304729494 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0318711172698 0.056905535591 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.0946893788 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 50.2224549098 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.32 12.4159519038 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.55 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.78957915832 158% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.