While people in developing countries are happier than in the past, people in developed countries are less happy. Why? What can be learnt from this?
The pursuit of happiness is a universal human desire, but recent studies have shown that people in developing countries are happier than they were in the past while people in developed countries are less happy. In this essay, we will explore the factors that contribute to this phenomenon and what can be learned from it.
One possible explanation for the difference in happiness levels between these two groups is related to their respective priorities. People in developing countries tend to place greater emphasis on family, community, and social connections as sources of happiness, whereas people in developed countries often prioritize material wealth, career success, and individualism. This suggests that the pursuit of happiness may be influenced by cultural and societal values. Another factor that may explain why people in developed countries are less happy than in the past is the higher levels of stress and anxiety that are prevalent in these societies. Work demands, financial pressures, and social isolation can all contribute to reduced well-being. In contrast, people in developing countries may have lower expectations for their lives and may be more focused on finding joy in the present moment.
What can be learned from this is that happiness is a complex and multifaceted concept that cannot be measured solely by material possessions or professional success. It is important to recognize that different cultural contexts may have different priorities when it comes to what makes people happy. Policy-makers should prioritize reducing sources of stress and anxiety while encouraging individuals to prioritize relationships and community connections.
In conclusion, the differences in happiness levels between people in developing and developed countries suggest that the pursuit of happiness is shaped by cultural values and societal factors.
- Some countries achieve international success by building specialized facilities to train top athletes instead of providing sports facilities that everyone can use Is it a positive or negative development 82
- In many countries people like to eat a wider range of food than can be grown in their local place Therefore much of the food people eat today has to come from other regions Do you think the advantages of this development outweigh disadvantages 78
- Some people argue job satisfaction is more important than job security Others believe a permanent job is more important Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 73
- While people in developing countries are happier than in the past people in developed countries are less happy Why What can be learnt from this 73
- In many countries the number of animals and plants is declining Why do you think it is happening How to solve this issue 11
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, may, so, well, whereas, while, in conclusion, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1594.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 283.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.63250883392 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10153676581 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98314007779 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 147.0 176.041082164 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.519434628975 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 490.5 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.9737484466 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.833333333 106.682146367 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5833333333 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5 7.06120827912 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.560935961981 0.244688304435 229% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.188449711194 0.084324248473 223% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.142621449681 0.0667982634062 214% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.360143132859 0.151304729494 238% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.144004652751 0.056905535591 253% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 13.0946893788 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.67 12.4159519038 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.52 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.7795591182 158% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.