Write about the following topic.
Some organisations believe that their employees should dress smartly. Others value quality of work above appearance.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
You should write at least 250 words.
It is often argued that some organisations prefer that dressing smartly is necessary but other organisations argue that quality of work matters rather than dressing. I agree that dressing smartly as well as quality of work matters. I will discuss both the views in the below paragraphs.
On the one hand, Some organisations prefer that their employees should dress smartly. There are number of reasons that why companies prefer that their employees should wear smart dresses. Dressing smartly give employees more confidence and they feel more active during the office timing. In meetings also employees tend to wear smart dresses because it reflects the company image in front of clients. For example, If we take any leader of any company they always wear smart dresses, Not just for the appearance but by dressing smartly they look more confident, more clear, more active.
On the other hand, Some companies argue that quality of work matters rather than appearance. I agree that quality of work matters but if you are not dressed well the output level of employee gets affected, which leads to development in business of companies. Quality of work can only be achieved if employees are giving there maximum output or productivity and are keeping full track of the work with proper awareness. By following this one can have better work quality.
In Conclusion, Although dressing smartly gives more confidence, clear thoughts, more activeness but quality of work is also an important point. So it seems to me that organisations should focus both on dressing smartly and quality of work equally.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-07-25 | linh allie | 89 | view |
| 2024-07-25 | linh allie | 84 | view |
| 2023-07-29 | maria ayoub | 78 | view |
| 2023-07-27 | dolle123 | 56 | view |
| 2023-04-11 | johnlark1908 | 56 | view |
- The chart below shows the results of a survey of people who visited four types of tourist attraction in Britain in 1999 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- Some people think that instead of preventing climate change we need to find a way to live with it To what extent do you agree or disagree Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience 56
- Information technology is changing many aspects of our lives and now dominates our home leisure and work activities To what extent do the benefits of information technology outweigh the disadvantages Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant e 73
- The chart below shows the value of one country s exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016 Th table shows the percentage change in each category of exports in 2016 compared with 2015 Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main f 67
- The graph below shows the number of university graduates in Canada from 1992 to 2007 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, look, so, well, for example, in conclusion, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 41.998997996 67% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1343.0 1615.20841683 83% => OK
No of words: 261.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.14559386973 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0193898071 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60371820906 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 136.0 176.041082164 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.521072796935 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 405.0 506.74238477 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.0534159839 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.9285714286 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6428571429 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.28571428571 7.06120827912 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.328118644455 0.244688304435 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.127810340462 0.084324248473 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0394749703759 0.0667982634062 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.20875564741 0.151304729494 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0243155523698 0.056905535591 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.59 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.55 8.58950901804 88% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 78.4519038076 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.