Young people in the modern world seem to have more power and influence than any previous young generation
Why is this the case?
What impact does this have on the relationship between old and young people?
Young generations are the future of a nation. Nowadays, they have lots of power and influence which was not seemed in any other previous young generation. The development of science and technology are the main reason for this and it has significantly affected the relations between the young and the aged people.
Today modern world gives us plenty of options to express our thoughts. We can give our opinion in any political or social matters though social media. Invention of internet makes us more powerful. For example if any company is doing illegal activities, they cannot hide this for long time because people can spread this through internet. Furthermore, sometimes we see many restaurants sell foods at high price and they try to deceive people to give them unhygienic foods but people take pictures of these foods and post it on online with the prices. As a result other people avoid going there and also government has to take necessary steps against these restaurants.
Another fact is that currently law is very strict and changed a lot. Now country gives them lots of privileges and also they can give their valuable opinions in any matters of the country which was very rare for young people in previous generations. Moreover, at present time many universities and colleges are built so people get lots of chance to educate themselves. When human studies they know their rights and responsibilities more accurately then illiterate peoples and so Education makes them more influential.
All these things have great impact in the relationships of two generations the young and the old. Most of the times they cannot understand each other points of views. The young people think them cleverer and often they show very little respect towards their elders. On the other hand, the older people do not want to change their perspectives and also they think young people use some of their powers in wrong direction and these young people try to dominate them.
In conclusion, it is true that with the development of the world young people become more powerful and it has often hampered their relationships with the old people. But if they use their power properly for the benefits of the society and work with the older generation, then the country will progress more.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-12-28 | ismailkuryazov7 | 67 | view |
| 2021-12-28 | Bakhtiyor | 87 | view |
| 2021-07-13 | sonicmaster | 67 | view |
| 2021-06-08 | www.www | 56 | view |
| 2021-02-07 | heyatafroz | 78 | view |
- Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships people make Has this become positive and negative development 78
- Illiteracy continues to be a concern for many countries in the world today What are the causes of illiteracy in the modern world and what ef ects does it have on the people concerned and on society as a whole 73
- The pie charts below show the comparison of different kinds of energy production of France in two years 67
- Young people in the modern world seem to have more power and influence than any previous young generation Why is this the case What impact does this have on the relationship between old and young people 73
- The charts below show the number of Japanese tourists travelling abroad between 1985 and 1995 and Australia s share of the Japanese tourist market Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 170, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...r relationships with the old people. But if they use their power properly for the...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, moreover, so, then, as to, for example, in conclusion, as a result, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 10.4138276553 202% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 41.0 24.0651302605 170% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1900.0 1615.20841683 118% => OK
No of words: 382.0 315.596192385 121% => OK
Chars per words: 4.97382198953 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.42095241839 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58517363467 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.528795811518 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 585.9 506.74238477 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.6666540179 49.4020404114 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.0 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1052631579 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.57894736842 7.06120827912 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.360558789749 0.244688304435 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.111917327734 0.084324248473 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0909989778348 0.0667982634062 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.214850080542 0.151304729494 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0909406586877 0.056905535591 160% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 50.2224549098 119% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.89 8.58950901804 92% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.