chemicals have been used in food factories
The fact that, more chemicals have been used in food factories is burning issue in today’s society. This sector has some advantages in human’s life, but perhaps it has some drawbacks for end users.
On the one hand, there are several benefits can be considered related to this trend. Concerning the first, by far the greatest benefit is these chemicals can help to keep the food for a long time. It assists to prevent the quality reduction of food and preserved them in many months or more. Therefore, a numerous of products have been transported to another cities, even many countries in the world. For instance, nowadays people in Vietnam can buy a lot of kind of fruit which originated from New Zealand, Canada and other countries. Another vital advantage that needs to be taken into account is that it is convenient for end users. Indeed, with long expired date, buyer can purchase products anytime they want and hold them in the kitchen, fridge or warehouse. So human are saving their time for cooking and it is easy to prepare a meal for their family.
On the other hand, there are also concerns about the influence of chemicals. The main disadvantage is almost chemicals which are used in the production and preservation affect influence for people’s healthy. According to a recent research of MIT in USA, the growing cancers rate in Vietnam is related to absorbing a little bit of chemicals every day from poisoned food. This would lead to people try to seek products which is originated from organic that avoid damage to their healthy. Another negative aspect is harm to the environment. In fact, a lot of foodstuff with chemicals cannot dissolve in many years throw away to nature. Along with the poor management of local authorities, the locals who do not have awareness of environmental protection cause pollution when littering.
In conclusion, although chemicals play a tremendous role in the production and preservation, its drawbacks could not be ignored.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-06-13 | Thuc Linh Dinh | 78 | view |
| 2019-10-26 | Karan.gulati07 | 81 | view |
| 2019-02-03 | the7850r | 73 | view |
| 2018-07-11 | tuanthaolove05 | 78 | view |
| 2017-05-24 | chitra | 81 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 450, Rule ID: A_LOT_OF_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun kind seems to be countable; consider using: 'a lot of kinds'.
Suggestion: a lot of kinds
...nce, nowadays people in Vietnam can buy a lot of kind of fruit which originated from New Zeal...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 226, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[3]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'recent research'.
Suggestion: recent research
...for people's healthy. According to a recent research of MIT in USA, the growing cancers rate...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 321, Rule ID: LITTLE_BIT[1]
Message: Reduce redundancy by using 'little' or 'bit'.
Suggestion: little; bit
...te in Vietnam is related to absorbing a little bit of chemicals every day from poisoned fo...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, so, therefore, for instance, in conclusion, in fact, kind of, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1660.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 332.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.2685907696 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77130695806 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.58734939759 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 519.3 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 26.1673153965 49.4020404114 53% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 92.2222222222 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4444444444 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.61111111111 7.06120827912 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.250849575034 0.244688304435 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0701603537129 0.084324248473 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.120905913572 0.0667982634062 181% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.159488345964 0.151304729494 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.102493143334 0.056905535591 180% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.72 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.71 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.