As countries have developed there has been a trend towards smaller family sizes.
Why does this happen?
How does this affect society?
Many countries around the world are becoming richer as they develop and at the same time these countries are seeing a reduction in the size of the family unit. This essay will discuss the reasons for this phenomenon and examine some of the possible effects it will have on society.
One of the principal reasons for the smaller family sizes is the rising immigration from rural towns to urban cities. As country develops, it creates more job opportunities in the major cities, which attracts aspiring young talent from small towns and villages to migrate in the city for work and business purposes. As a result of this, traditional joint family structure breaks out and old parents along with siblings are left in the village. Eventually, people start living in smaller families and it becomes a part of lifestyle. For example, the Times newspaper addressed the growing demand of smaller houses in many urban cities owing to smaller families.
The trend of smaller family units helps society to boost economy, as more people would want to live in their own houses, more houses would be built, and businesses depending on housing such as home appliances and banking industry will be benefited. However, children growing in these homes won’t have extended family members to look after them. This might make it difficult for parents to take care of kids when both are working, therefore, there would be many kinder gardens and nurseries to take care of kids. For example, Mumbai City Corporation declared that special subsidies will be given on lands if it is used to build large scale nurseries and primary schooling facilities.
In conclusion, developing nations have witnessed the change in joint family structures due to the immigration of people. This is positive development for the economy, whereas, negative for kids, as they would have to spend more time in nurseries instead of with their parents
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-10 | ns478511 | 84 | view |
| 2019-05-01 | chakravarthy.9866@gmail.com | 78 | view |
| 2019-04-24 | chakravarthy.9866@gmail.com | 78 | view |
- Governments should spend more money on railways rather than roads.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 84
- The growing number of overweight people is putting a strain on the health care system in an effort to deal with the health issues involved. Some people think that the best way to deal with this problem is to introduce more physical education lessons in th 84
- On a recent holiday you lost a valuable item. Fortunately, you have travel insurance to cover the cost of anything lost.Write a letter to the manager of your insurance company. In your letter•describe the item you lost•explain how you lost it•tell t 78
- In most developed countries shopping is not only about buying the goods you need, it is also perceived as entertainment. Is it a positive or negative development? Give your own opinion and examples based on your experience 73
- Some people believe that it is the responsibility of individuals to take care of their own health and diet. Others however believe that governments should make sure that their citizens have a healthy diet.Discuss both views and give your opinion. 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 229, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...reasons for this phenomenon and examine some of the possible effects it will have on societ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, look, so, therefore, whereas, for example, in conclusion, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1604.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 316.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07594936709 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21620550194 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52436452983 2.80592935109 90% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.575949367089 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 505.8 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.7622178558 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.384615385 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.3076923077 20.7667163134 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.06120827912 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.197514737519 0.244688304435 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0726785322958 0.084324248473 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.036372864964 0.0667982634062 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134045428451 0.151304729494 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0352902422386 0.056905535591 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.0946893788 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.48 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.32 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.