The development of tourism contributes to English becoming the most prominent language in the world. some people think this will lead to English becoming the only language to be spoken globally
What are the advantages and disadvantages to having one language in the world?
In the contemporary society, English is arguably the most prevailing language in the world due to the rapid development of tourism industries and globalisation. However, it is commonly believed that the trend could substantially increase the likelihood of English becoming the sole language utilized internationally. The following paragraphs will discuss the merits and demerits of speaking one language in the world.
It is reasonable to consider that the majority of people are the beneficiaries of such an eventuality. First of all, having one language in the world could enhance the efficiency ...
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-10-24 | VK_IELTS | 56 | view |
| 2019-08-26 | vikasnautiyal | 78 | view |
| 2018-06-25 | srinidhi | 68 | view |
| 2018-09-17 | moorthi | 61 | view |
| 2018-12-28 | joennika214 | 78 | view |
- In many countries, the amount of crime is increasing. What do you think are the main causes of crime? How can we deal with those causes? 90
- Everyone should become vegetarian because they do not need to eat meat to have a healthy diet. Do you agree or disagree. 66
- People in your area are having problems with their Internet connections Write a letter to this company which provides the connection In your letter 1 describe the problems 2 explain how they are affecting people 3 say what the company should do to help Yo 80
- Cycling is more environmental friendly than other forms of transport. Why it is not popular in many places? How can its popularity be increased? 90
- Today, the high sales of popular consumer goods reflect the power of advertising and not the real needs of the society in which they are sold.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 69
Comments
Essay evaluation report
flaws:
Better not to use two 'of' together, like:
as the culprit of the loss of cultural diversity
we may say:
as the culprit of losing cultural diversities //try one 'of' instead of two 'of', because:
A of B of C == (A of B) of C ???
A of B of C == A of (B of C) ???
---------------------
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 6.5 out of 9
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 13 15
No. of Words: 288 350
No. of Characters: 1549 1500
No. of Different Words: 163 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.12 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.378 4.6
Word Length SD: 3.133 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 118 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 102 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 79 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 49 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 22.154 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 7.461 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.462 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.367 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.587 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.078 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 269, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ad of other cultures and civilizations.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, however, if, so, for instance, in addition, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1597.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 287.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.56445993031 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11595363751 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.26296900056 2.80592935109 116% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.557491289199 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 496.8 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.3327697912 49.4020404114 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.846153846 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0769230769 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.84615384615 7.06120827912 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.347664560821 0.244688304435 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.114367800582 0.084324248473 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0670158543348 0.0667982634062 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.196196183203 0.151304729494 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0948456368176 0.056905535591 167% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.97 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.84 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.