IN GENERAL PEOPLE DO NOT HAVE SUCH A CLOSE RELATIONSHIP WITH THEIR NEIGHBORS AS COMPARED TO THE PAST? WHY THIS IS SO? AND WHAT CAN BE DONE TO IMPROVE THE CONTACT BETWEEN THE NEIGHBORS?
The cordial relationships have been drastically reduced among different persons of the society. People, today, either do not know the persons living in their vicinity or fail to fraternize with them. This essay will explain the causes behind this solitariness attitude along with presentation of few solutions, which will improve the communication gap.
To begin with reasons: first, the hectic working schedule of the people can be blamed for this problem. Owing to rising inflation, people are working more than their normal hours to cater the multifarious needs of their family. So, they do not have adequate time to socialize with their neighbors. Secondly, due to the easy accessibility of not only various social networking sites, but also of virtual games on the internet, modern individuals prefer to remain more self-occupied rather than intermingling with the persons residing in their surroundings. Hence, these factors are most responsible for deteriorating the mutual bonding among two adjacent families.
Nevertheless, some solutions can always be adopted to ameliorate this growing concern. First, the local councilors should organize community get together on public holidays. If these events are organized at frequent intervals, then the local residents can develop more amiable relationships with each other. Second, because neighbors are the first persons who come to rescue during the times of distress and emergency, old and mature persons should aware their progeny about the momentous role of the neighbors as compared to online friends and distant relatives.Consequently, this problem can be easily tackled by implementing these remedies in letter and spirit.
In conclusion, although earning money and material possessions have become the need of an hour, the relationship with neighbors can never be put at stake.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-18 | prabhleenpreet kaur | 84 | view |
- SOME PEOPLE THINK THAT EXERCISE IS THE KEY TO HEALTH WHILE OTHERS FEEL THAT HAVING A BALANCED DIET IS MORE IMPORTANT.DISCUSS BOTH SIDES AND GIVE YOUR OPINION? 89
- TODAY MORE PEOPLE ARE OVERWEIGHT THAN EVER BEFORE. WHAT IN YOUR OPINION IS THE PRIMARY CAUSES OF THIS? WHAT ARE THE MAIN EFFECTS OF THIS EPIDEMIC? 73
- PLANTING TREE IS VERY IMPORTANT FOR THE ENVIRONMENT. SOME PEOPLE SAY TREES SHOULD BE PLANTED IN THE VACANT AREA OF CITIES AND TOWNS, WHILE OTHERS SAYS HOUSING FACILITIES SHOULD BE BUILD INSTEAD.DO YOU AGREE OR DISAGREE? 67
- IN GENERAL PEOPLE DO NOT HAVE SUCH A CLOSE RELATIONSHIP WITH THEIR NEIGHBORS AS COMPARED TO THE PAST? WHY THIS IS SO? AND WHAT CAN BE DONE TO IMPROVE THE CONTACT BETWEEN THE NEIGHBORS? 84
- SOME TEACHERS THINK THAT INTERNATIONAL STUDENT EXCHANGE WOULD BE BENEFICIAL FOR ALL TEENAGE SCHOOL STUDENTS. DO YOU THINK ITS ADVANTAGES OUTWEIGH ITS DISADVANTAGES? 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 564, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Consequently
...to online friends and distant relatives.Consequently, this problem can be easily tackled by ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, hence, if, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, then, in conclusion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1573.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 280.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.61785714286 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09062348924 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03254246063 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.660714285714 0.561755894193 118% => OK
syllable_count: 483.3 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 77.3338264284 49.4020404114 157% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.0 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5384615385 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.69230769231 7.06120827912 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.305103700682 0.244688304435 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0966866823545 0.084324248473 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0614207600942 0.0667982634062 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.173320861975 0.151304729494 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0152284511255 0.056905535591 27% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.32 12.4159519038 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.32 8.58950901804 120% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 78.4519038076 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.