Has the easier food preparation process nowadays improved the way people live?
Food processing and cooking are much easier due to the easy availability of modern kitchen appliances and pre-mix ingredients from the supermarket. Nowadays, people can enjoy a variety of meals daily basis. However, easier, quicker and tastier food have brought some difficult health issues too.
Let us begin with the positive impacts of easier food preparation in our life. Firstly, using modern types of kitchen equipment such as microwave, electronic cookers, ovens etc; have made cooking activities more convenient and fun. Correct use of right equipment has added a great deal of taste on food. Secondly, readymade food and pre-packed ingredients from the shelves of the supermarket provide us with a variety of taste and flavor with minimal cost and save a lot of time which can be utilized to pursue hobbies and/or spent with family. Furthermore, some ultra-modern can calculate the calorie from the food and which is very useful to people who want to control the diet. More importantly, modern way of cooking has largely reduced the kitchen hazards such as burning, heat irritation, fire danger etc.
In contrast, the convenient and quick meals have increased the intake of salt, sugar, and fat. Consequently, many people are facing health-related problems such as obesity, cardiovascular diseases etc. Premix ingredients have preservatives and other harmful contents and similarly processed meat such as ham, bacon, salami etc contains a lot of salt. Regular intake of preservatives and processed food for a long time could lead to dangerous health damage and cancer. Moreover, eating large amount junk or fast food also degrading our health and increasing weight.
In conclusion, human life is getting easier and more convenient with the modern way of cooking, however, bad eating habit is leading us toward serious health deterioration. A possible solution is to switch to healthy and fresh ingredients either we prepare and eat at home or eat outsides.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-10-22 | Laxman Basyal | 84 | view |
- Do you support that the nuclear technology should be used for constructive purposes?Use your own knowledge and experience and support your arguments with examples and relevant evidence.Give reasons for your viewpoint. 56
- Do you think children should be given a lot of homework or not Apart from the homework what do you think the children can do to pass their free time 68
- USING A COMPUTER EVERYDAY CAN HAVE MORE NEGATIVE THAN POSITIVE EFFECT ON YOUR CHILDREN.DO YOU AGREE OR DISAGREE? 78
- In recent years proportion of crime committed by youngsters is on the rise family are solely responsible for this trend Do you agree or disagree with the statement 93
- The mass media, including television, radio, newspapers, and social media have great influence in shaping people's ideas.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 178, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...icrowave, electronic cookers, ovens etc; have made cooking activities more conven...
^^
Line 4, column 306, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...as added a great deal of taste on food. Secondly, readymade food and pre-packed ...
^^
Line 4, column 816, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rning, heat irritation, fire danger etc. In contrast, the convenient and quick me...
^^^^^
Line 6, column 566, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ading our health and increasing weight. In conclusion, human life is getting eas...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, similarly, so, in conclusion, in contrast, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 22.0 10.4138276553 211% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 6.0 24.0651302605 25% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1666.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 313.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.32268370607 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20616286096 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82725040164 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.603833865815 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 511.2 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 5.43587174349 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.6570441052 49.4020404114 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.125 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5625 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.75 7.06120827912 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.206960602273 0.244688304435 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0676917459015 0.084324248473 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0467141679273 0.0667982634062 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.127551292465 0.151304729494 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0409754904477 0.056905535591 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.07 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.