Inventors are not as important to society as doctors.
To what extent do you agree with this statement?
Contemporary societies have been dependent on inventors as well as doctors for numerous reasons. The topic of deciding which one is more important to societal wellbeing is controversial, introducing heavy debate. There has been a growing body of opinion favoring doctors to be at a higher level than scientists, while I am in consummate discord with it and argue that the 21st generation could survive without technological and traveling inventions.
Firstly, inventors have made our life smooth in every possible aspect, considering technological advances the most influential among all. The primitive instance of this can be exemplified in the reliance of people of all ages on computers, mobiles, the internet, machinery equipment at home and work, and so on. As most would agree expecting people to imagine their lives without them is highly unrealistic, the argument that doctors are crucial to communities rather than inventors can be debunked.
Secondly, the comparison of the bullock cart era with today' s enhanced traveling methods puts inventors above doctors. Inventors have enabled individuals to travel around the world by providing easy and cheap alternatives with their sheer hard work. an increasing trade among nations has benefited almost every society around the globe, creating employment opportunities for its residents. Thus, inventors need to be given precedence over doctor when discussing this topic.
However, humans have to visit doctors during illness, making them valuable for society. They help people to fight with life[-threating diseases such as cancers, heart attack and other cardiovascular diseases. When we can not endure the pain of accidental injuries, the first thing we do is to run to the hospital. As convincing as this point is, doctors are also dependent on the scientists for the equipment, new medicines, and viable cures to treat illness. Hence, doctors can not serve the community without the help of inventors.
Following this look, inventions in technology and traveling alternatives by inventors have brought a mammoth of benefits for societies. Therefore, it is the inventor rather than a doctor whose work is more rewarding as shown by this essay. I thus hope that human intelligence and ingenuity continue appreciating their work in the foreseeable future.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-09-14 | elham mousavi | 61 | view |
| 2024-09-09 | elham mousavi | 61 | view |
| 2024-08-14 | elham mousavi | 56 | view |
| 2024-08-06 | elham mousavi | 67 | view |
| 2024-08-04 | elham mousavi | 56 | view |
- Some people say that educational success most of the time depends on having a good teacher Others say that student attitudes also do matters Discuss both views and give your opinion 73
- One of your colleagues recently got a new job at another company Write a letter to him her and say how you feel about him her what you enjoyed the most while working together and ask what his her plans are 61
- Some people believe that for a hobby to be enjoyable it should be hard to acquire or learn Do you agree or disagree with this statement 73
- Some people prefer to provide help and support directly to those in need Others however prefer to give money to national and international charitable organisations Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 84
- With the rise of e books comes the decline of the paper books what are advantages and disadvantages of this trend 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 250, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: An
...lternatives with their sheer hard work. an increasing trade among nations has bene...
^^
Line 5, column 125, Rule ID: EN_UNPAIRED_BRACKETS
Message: Unpaired symbol: ']' seems to be missing
...ty. They help people to fight with life[-threating diseases such as cancers, hea...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, hence, however, if, look, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, well, while, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1959.0 1615.20841683 121% => OK
No of words: 359.0 315.596192385 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.45682451253 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35284910392 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9976493663 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 226.0 176.041082164 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.629526462396 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 610.2 506.74238477 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.9822688405 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.833333333 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9444444444 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.61111111111 7.06120827912 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.242039428535 0.244688304435 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0699818548409 0.084324248473 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0417953880888 0.0667982634062 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128010416128 0.151304729494 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0234874042296 0.056905535591 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.46 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 78.4519038076 141% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.