learning art is waste time and children should spend more time on studying Maths, Physics,....
Studying art or studying science subjects has become an integral part òf the ongoing discussion in contemporary society. It is widely debated whether learning art is waste time and children should spend more time on studying Maths, Physics. Personally, I strongly agree that student should spend time to learn the subjects which are their strenghts, and no subject is waste of time if we study. This essay will give some reasons and pertinent examples to back up my viewpoint.
One of the most compelling arguments in favor of the idea is that art subject helps student develop their ability, especially when they are talent. This means that they attach special importance to art, concentrate on studying, and don’t feel like it’s a mind-numbing experience compare with science subjects. Once student learn their forte subject, they will earn higher result, and get higer oucomes as well as sastified rewards. This clearly demonstrates that art has positive impact on student.
Another interesting point is that each subject has meaning in its speciality. This is because of the fact that in real life each major all contribute to the morden world. One example to supports this view is that we have many success artist from the past to now and they are very famous. I can enumerate some well-known man, such as Picasso, Vincent Van Gogh, et cetera… Their paintings are still admired today for their beauty and originality. This evidence suggests that not just only Maths or Physics can help us get achivement.
In conclusion, this essay argued that art is important for student. Howerver, everythiing has its pros and cons, and this situation is not exception. Hence, efficient use or art should be encouraged, but its abuse should be considerate.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-06-30 | trunghatakegrcr | 78 | view |
- skytrain 2 11
- sk3 11
- computer games 61
- sky train 56
- living alone 56
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 247, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...entrate on studying, and don’t feel like it’s a mind-numbing experience compare w...
^^
Line 3, column 62, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...oint is that each subject has meaning in its speciality. This is because of the f...
^^
Line 3, column 87, Rule ID: BECAUSE_OF_THE_FACT_THAT[1]
Message: This phrase is redundant. Use simply 'because'.
Suggestion: because
...has meaning in its speciality. This is because of the fact that in real life each major all contribute ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 187, Rule ID: TO_NON_BASE[1]
Message: The verb after "to" should be in the base form: 'support'.
Suggestion: support
...ute to the morden world. One example to supports this view is that we have many success ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 222, Rule ID: MANY_FEW_UNCOUNTABLE[2]
Message: Use 'much' or 'little' with uncountable nouns.
Suggestion: much; little
...e to supports this view is that we have many success artist from the past to now and...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, if, so, still, well, in conclusion, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 24.0651302605 154% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 23.0 41.998997996 55% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1473.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 289.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.09688581315 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64043543432 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.636678200692 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 439.2 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 5.0 0.809619238477 618% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.5516416637 49.4020404114 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.0625 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0625 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.1875 7.06120827912 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.306860813682 0.244688304435 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0915733295274 0.084324248473 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.160484732692 0.0667982634062 240% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.171183206655 0.151304729494 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.187793995161 0.056905535591 330% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 50.2224549098 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.0 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.85 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 247, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...entrate on studying, and don’t feel like it’s a mind-numbing experience compare w...
^^
Line 3, column 62, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...oint is that each subject has meaning in its speciality. This is because of the f...
^^
Line 3, column 87, Rule ID: BECAUSE_OF_THE_FACT_THAT[1]
Message: This phrase is redundant. Use simply 'because'.
Suggestion: because
...has meaning in its speciality. This is because of the fact that in real life each major all contribute ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 187, Rule ID: TO_NON_BASE[1]
Message: The verb after "to" should be in the base form: 'support'.
Suggestion: support
...ute to the morden world. One example to supports this view is that we have many success ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 222, Rule ID: MANY_FEW_UNCOUNTABLE[2]
Message: Use 'much' or 'little' with uncountable nouns.
Suggestion: much; little
...e to supports this view is that we have many success artist from the past to now and...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, if, so, still, well, in conclusion, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 24.0651302605 154% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 23.0 41.998997996 55% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1473.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 289.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.09688581315 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64043543432 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.636678200692 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 439.2 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 5.0 0.809619238477 618% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.5516416637 49.4020404114 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.0625 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0625 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.1875 7.06120827912 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.306860813682 0.244688304435 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0915733295274 0.084324248473 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.160484732692 0.0667982634062 240% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.171183206655 0.151304729494 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.187793995161 0.056905535591 330% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 50.2224549098 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.0 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.85 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.