The level of noise around us is constantly increasing, and is affecting the quality of our lives. What cause the noise? What should be done about it?
It is true that noise pollution is growing at an alarming rate, affecting the standard of living of human beings. The main reason for this is the transportation systems and a viable solution is to introduce credible alternatives to curb these problems.
Perhaps the most important reason for sound pollution is the increase in vehicle movement. This is because the number of cars on the road is increasing day by day and while they are especially in traffic congestion, they produce sound which is no less than a nuisance. Additionally, people living beside railway stations also have to put up with a lot of noise from horns, and engines of freight trains, thereby leading to discomfort, displeasure and sleep disruption. For instance, a state study in Illinois found those living near railroad stations, especially those with high traffic volume, to have several health conditions including hypertension, high stress levels, hearing loss and sleep disturbances.
Fortunately, however, there are some promising solutions to these problems. First of all, governments should invest more in cycle lanes to encourage people to use bicycles instead of cars. This would reduce the number of automobiles on the road and consequently lessen the noise. Taking London as an example, the local council has built cycle paths for their residents to encourage them cycle to work. Secondly, the responsible authorities could build a track system, that can be used to fasten the sides of the rail, to absorb vibrations and reduces noise generated as train wheels pass over them.
In conclusion, the major problem of noisy environment caused by transportation vehicles can be alleviated by the introduction of bike path and rail system.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e alternatives to curb these problems. Perhaps the most important reason for so...
^^^
Line 5, column 373, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...built cycle paths for their residents to encourage them cycle to work. Secondly, ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, first, however, second, secondly, so, while, for instance, in conclusion, first of all, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1454.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 276.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.26811594203 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07593519647 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89306546198 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.648550724638 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 441.9 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.3425526296 49.4020404114 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.166666667 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.83333333333 7.06120827912 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.116219762212 0.244688304435 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0370544992946 0.084324248473 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0397357533088 0.0667982634062 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0669304568806 0.151304729494 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0155077412357 0.056905535591 27% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.24 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.