In many countries plastic bags are the main source of rubbish causing pollution in oceans and on land; therefore they should be banned. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
It is undeniable that plastic waste significantly has negative impacts on environment and wildlife such as birds and marines. I completely agree with banning plastic bags' manufactures and I am going to determine the supporting points of my view throughout this essay.
With a ban on plastic bags, there would be improved technology which would boost other business. In fact, banning plastic bags helps saving money, so the nations could invest that money in technology and more beneficial business. A good illustration of that could be developing e-learning in nation's education system. Additionally, throughout banning plastic bags the people will learn to support local workers together with green industries. As a matter of fact, by a prohibition on plastic bag usage, people looking for a more convenient and harmless replacement. Thus, prohibiting plastic usage could have significant impacts on technology or other businesses also it would bring a local worker support.
Furthermore, through the banning of plastic, cities in various nations can begin to focus on other bigger waste diversion challenges such as providing eco-friendly products to houses, restaurants or hotel. In addition, bans should be adopted because there are greatly effective at reducing plastic bag waste. There is a lot of energy consumption to produce plastic bags. Not only energy has a key role in plastic manufacture, but also time and non-renewable resources can be noticeable. Hence, banning plastic production prevents other degradation effects by concentrating on resolving waste diversion challenges as well as decreases waste of other resources.
To conclude, while there are compelling arguments about banning plastic litters, I profoundly believe that benefits of adopting bans far outweigh its drawback. As it is obvious plastic products are harmful to the environment and human and animal health and banning them has many advantages which worth consideration and implementation.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-05-03 | sdhbti | 61 | view |
| 2019-04-22 | gillmandeep0260 | 84 | view |
| 2019-04-16 | Glenn20sal | 73 | view |
| 2018-07-01 | Mafijur | 73 | view |
| 2018-04-30 | maryam2 | 73 | view |
- In many countries plastic bags are the main source of rubbish causing pollution in oceans and on land therefore they should be banned To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 90
- Global warming is one of the most important issues that the world is facing today. What are the causes of global warming and what measure can government and individuals take to tackle the issue? 73
- national happiness index has better performance than the economic increase in a nation's development. do you agree and how to measure national happiness? 80
- Learning a new language at an early age is helpful for children. Is it more positive for their future aspect or have some adverse effects? Agree or disagree? 85
- Whether the design of the building will have a positive or negative impact on people's life and work? 77
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 134, Rule ID: ADVISE_VBG[5]
Message: The verb 'help' is used with infinitive: 'to save' or 'save'.
Suggestion: to save; save
...ss. In fact, banning plastic bags helps saving money, so the nations could invest that...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, hence, if, look, so, thus, well, while, in addition, in fact, such as, as a matter of fact, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1685.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 300.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.61666666667 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07003257312 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.59 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 516.6 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.9421757828 49.4020404114 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.333333333 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.4 7.06120827912 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.145363591022 0.244688304435 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0573594546066 0.084324248473 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0359089062976 0.0667982634062 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0931132120416 0.151304729494 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0278567005089 0.056905535591 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.32 12.4159519038 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.52 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.