Many office authorities impose a restriction on smoking within the office premises. Some governments have even banned smoking in all public places. This is a good idea but it takes away some of our freedom.
Without any doubt, smoking is injurious and deadly to human health. it causes many dangerous diseases not only to the main smokers but also to surrounding non-smokers through passive smoking. Due to the severe health effects, many people are in favor of restricting or banning of smoking in public places and in offices. Although smokers argue this a restriction on their freedom, from my point of view, practicing a harmful activity in public should not come under the definition of freedom and therefore banning does not violate any freedom.
In addition to to the direct impacts to the main smokers, smoking in public also seriously affect other non-smokers mainly in two ways. Firstly, by the way of passive smoking when non-smokers inhale smoke and dangerous contents and have similar health damage as the main smoker. Secondly, Invitational or persuasive effect when non-smokers are attracted and follow smokers. The latter effect is more serious in the case of children since they tend to copy when they see their parents or others smoking.
On the other hand, smokers argue that smoking is related to their work performance at workplace and they need frequent smoking to feel relief and get concentration. But consuming harmful substance to feel better is not justifiable as it is more or less equivalent to have harmful drugs. Furthermore, it is office administration's right to decide what their staff can do or can not don within the office environment and so is true with the government to make a wise decision for the benefit of a large number of people. Last but not least, the cost of health insurance and government health budget is continued to increase because of rising smoking-related illness. Thus smoking limitation is essential to reduce the risks associated with it. The advantages of banning overweight the disadvantages of inconvenience to the smokers.
In conclusion, smoking banning is imperative and should be applied for the benefits of many non-smokers and to reduce the possible risk of children to be addicted. Some designated smoking areas could be introduced at workplaces in order to respect the rights of smokers, nevertheless, smoking should not be done in the public areas and in offices.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-12 | coolchris2100 | 78 | view |
- The restoration of old buildings in major cities in the world spends numerous government expenditures. This money should be use in new housing and road development. To what extent do you agree or disagree. 73
- Many people believe that women make better parents than men and that is why they have a greater role in raising children in most societies Others claim that men are just as good as women at parenting 84
- Some sports are extremely dangerous but many people still like them very much. However some others think extremely dangerous games should be banned. Why do people take part in dangerous sports give some suggestions on how to deal with dangerous. 73
- In some countries, an increasing number of people are suffering from health problems as a result of eating too much fast food. It is, therefore, necessary for governments to impose a higher tax on this kind of food. 67
- Government investment in the arts, such as music and theatre, is a waste of money. Governments must invest this money in public services instead.To what extent do yo u agree with this statement? 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 69, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...s injurious and deadly to human health. it causes many dangerous diseases not only...
^^
Line 4, column 13, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: to
...not violate any freedom. In addition to to the direct impacts to the main smokers,...
^^^^^
Line 6, column 493, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...make a wise decision for the benefit of a large number of people. Last but not least, the cost of...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, if, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, in addition, in conclusion, by the way, more or less, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 10.4138276553 202% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 41.998997996 140% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1874.0 1615.20841683 116% => OK
No of words: 364.0 315.596192385 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.14835164835 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.36792674256 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8944833829 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.53021978022 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 574.2 506.74238477 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.4532727095 49.4020404114 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.125 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.75 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.5 7.06120827912 149% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.240294436332 0.244688304435 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0740208244275 0.084324248473 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0484954969468 0.0667982634062 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142293271475 0.151304729494 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0410283199318 0.056905535591 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.89 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.68 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.