Most artist earn low salaries and should therefore receive funding from the government in order for them to continue with their work To what extent do you agree or disagree

Essay topics:

Most artist earn low salaries and should therefore receive funding from the government in order for them to continue with their work. To what extent do you agree or disagree.

Many painters are low income earners and as a result, should be given some form of financial assistance from appropriate authorities to enable continuity of career. This essay totally agrees that painters require financial support from authorities because firstly, the money gotten can be used to improve their skills and secondly it is important for purchasing quality tools and materials essential for work.

Financing art work by government is essential as the funds gotten can be invested on training and developing their skills. This makes them able to afford any kind of workshop that is vital to improving their career, idea generation as well as creativity. The effect of this leads to expansion and overall success in career. For example, In Ghana, 70% of their artist attend workshops in the United kingdom annually as a result of government funding.

Funding of artiste enables the affordability of quality working tools. It enables them purchase quality and durable materials that enhances the appearance of the drawings and paintings. An art work done with the best materials such as paints and boards looks more appealing to the eyes and attracts more tourists than work done with substandard materials and equipment, and this can overall help to improve an economy.

In conclusion, receiving funding and support from authorities is essential to artists especially their career as it reduces the use of substandard materials for their design and also helps improve their knowledge due to the affordability of several training, hence increasing motivation and creativity.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2020-11-02 bibidolce 61 view
2020-06-10 urvashi saxena 89 view
2019-06-05 A VATSAL KUMAR 90 view
2018-11-22 chaiturishan 82 view
2016-09-22 swati.vekariya 77 view
Essays by user bibidolce :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 242, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U[8]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun training seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'some training'.
Suggestion: some training
...r knowledge due to the affordability of several training, hence increasing motivation and creati...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, hence, look, second, secondly, so, well, for example, in conclusion, kind of, such as, as a result, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1344.0 1615.20841683 83% => OK
No of words: 250.0 315.596192385 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.376 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97635364384 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80934440751 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 142.0 176.041082164 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.568 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 412.2 506.74238477 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 73.8455144203 49.4020404114 149% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.4 106.682146367 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0 20.7667163134 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.2 7.06120827912 187% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.238809171712 0.244688304435 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0930128253691 0.084324248473 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0487990816405 0.0667982634062 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.143206086103 0.151304729494 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0201885090136 0.056905535591 35% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.0946893788 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.22 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.55 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
More content wanted.

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.