Nowadays adults do little exercises. Some people believe that the best way to address this issue is by covering great sports events such as the Olympics on television. Other think that it is more beneficial to take other measures what is your opinion.
In modern times, mature people usually show a lack of interest in physical fitness. Majority of masses argue that this issue can be tackled by organising colossal sports festivals on broadcast media. In my opinion, this idea may not be effective in developing enthusiasm in public for exercise; However, there are numerous possible ways to address this challenge.
The government and companies could play a vitally important role to answer this debatable issue. Firstly, the public authorities should subsidise the sports equipment and relax some tax burden on physical health clubs. As a result, not only adults, youngsters also may be encouraged to play different sports or joint health clubs for regular exercise. Secondly, if professional working places should rearrange their working schedule by including a certain period for physical exercise, then workers could get time for their health wellness. For example, some multinational companies provide classes for aerobic exercise or yoga at their own building where they can devote some time to exercise from a hectic working schedule.
Although these suggestions may resolve this problem, watching these big sports events on television is also a positive medium to stay motivated to remain physical fit. For instance, most youngsters choose their career in sports after watching the Olympics and the World Cup. Yet the clusters of games may attract only the young generation rather than other age groups.
Overall, it seems advisable that other initiatives by the government or employer would be more productive and bring positive outcomes in adults than watching sports telecasts on television.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-05-18 | Sewak Singh | 73 | view |
- Money should be spent on creating new public buildings such as museums or town halls rather than renovating the existing ones To what extent do you agree or disagree 92
- Nowadays people are less fit and healthy than they were in the past which could affect their long term health why do you think this is what can be done to solve this problem 72
- Nowadays many people have access to computers on a wide basis and a large number of children play computer games What are the negative impacts of playing computer games and what can be done to minimise the bad effects 84
- these days many families move abroad for work some people believe that this benefits the children in their families other believe that it make their lives more difficult discuss both views and give your opinion 76
- SOME THINK THAT CLIMATE CHANGE REFORMS WILL NEGATIVELY AFFECT BUSINESS OTHERS FEEL THEY ARE AN OPPORTUNITY FOR BUSINESSES DISCUSS BOTH SIDES AND GIVE YOUR OWN OPINION 78
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 151, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'sports'' or 'sport's'?
Suggestion: sports'; sport's
...public authorities should subsidise the sports equipment and relax some tax burden on ...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, then, thus, well, for example, for instance, as a result, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 41.998997996 62% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1405.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 256.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.48828125 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67008974989 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.65625 0.561755894193 117% => OK
syllable_count: 432.9 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.0185444517 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.083333333 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3333333333 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.0833333333 7.06120827912 157% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.166370470704 0.244688304435 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0569348151143 0.084324248473 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0330517423777 0.0667982634062 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102654257485 0.151304729494 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0251116058076 0.056905535591 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.56 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.92 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 151, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'sports'' or 'sport's'?
Suggestion: sports'; sport's
...public authorities should subsidise the sports equipment and relax some tax burden on ...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, then, thus, well, for example, for instance, as a result, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 41.998997996 62% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1405.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 256.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.48828125 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67008974989 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.65625 0.561755894193 117% => OK
syllable_count: 432.9 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.0185444517 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.083333333 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3333333333 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.0833333333 7.06120827912 157% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.166370470704 0.244688304435 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0569348151143 0.084324248473 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0330517423777 0.0667982634062 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102654257485 0.151304729494 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0251116058076 0.056905535591 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.56 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.92 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.