One of the most conspicuous trends of today's world is a colossal upsurge in the number of people believing that people use to spend less time at home due to work and more preference for outdoor activities, which directly affect their personal as well as social life. In this easy, i would discuss both sides of statement in following paragraphs.
One the one side, there are deluges of arguments in favour of why people not to spend much time at home. The most preponderant one is that masses have become workaholic, and they are in rat race in order to earn money, by doing so, they spend a great proportion of time at office. It cannot only contribute to boost their income level, but also leads to numerous other effects such as they make friends their, with whom people love to spend time. Another pivotal aspect of aforementioned propositions is that it is only likely to help one excel and thrive in varied areas. Beside, there are variety of clubs, parks, shopping centers where people can socialize and spend quality time with others, and such kinds of things are not possible at home. For instance, the study results published by the government of Australia in March 2014 and April 2016 clearly indicate that more than 75% people loved to stay outside of home due to work and entertainment. Hence, it is apparent that why increasing number of folks chose to go outside rather than home.
One the other side, there are myriad of consequences on people's personal and civic life. Primary one lies in the fact that it is beneficial for individual because people get chance to earn a great chunk of money, which is dire need to survive in the long run. Also, human is a social animal when Humans consume much time outside of home then they get opportunity to explore themselves that is not possible to achieve by sitting at home. Apart from this, it is a great deal of spending time with others which creates social bonds among masses and add more social links which help them to help each other in their critical time. Thanks to wide range of advantages it offers, masses can enhance the quality and productivity of their lives with much ease efficacy and convenience by spending their time outside.
To conclude, having ponderd over above stated it is crystal clear that people use to spend less time at home for various reasons to connect with different people and to get money which have affected their lives positively.
- Some people say modern innovations bring lot of problem than benefits Do you agree or disagree 95
- Some universities now offer their courses on the Internet so that people can study online Is this a positive or negative development Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience Write at least 250 w 95
- Mission to explore space is hugely expensive and there are problems on Earth which demand attention The number of these missions needs to be reduced Do you agree or disagree 65
- In recent years many small local shops have closed because customers travel to large shopping centers or malls to do their shopping Is this a positive development or negative development 92
- Travelling abroad is regarded as a valuable and good activity for young people but some people think it takes too much money and time Discuss both views and give your opinion 95
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 120, Rule ID: USE_TO_VERB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'used'?
Suggestion: used
... number of people believing that people use to spend less time at home due to work ...
^^^
Line 1, column 282, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...l as well as social life. In this easy, i would discuss both sides of statement i...
^
Line 3, column 672, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s to wide range of advantages it offers, masses can enhance the quality and produ...
^^
Line 4, column 79, Rule ID: USE_TO_VERB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'used'?
Suggestion: used
... stated it is crystal clear that people use to spend less time at home for various ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, so, then, well, apart from, for instance, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 7.30460921844 219% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 75.0 41.998997996 179% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2006.0 1615.20841683 124% => OK
No of words: 426.0 315.596192385 135% => OK
Chars per words: 4.70892018779 5.12529762239 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.54310108192 4.20363070211 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.39832132142 2.80592935109 85% => OK
Unique words: 221.0 176.041082164 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.518779342723 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 644.4 506.74238477 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 20.2975951904 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 51.4110234613 49.4020404114 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.733333333 106.682146367 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.4 20.7667163134 137% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.53333333333 7.06120827912 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.292742449286 0.244688304435 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0976773932267 0.084324248473 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0600318872495 0.0667982634062 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.196440875146 0.151304729494 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0326402131748 0.056905535591 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.52 50.2224549098 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.33 12.4159519038 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.36 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.1190380762 130% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.