Nowadays more and more young people hold the important positions in the government. Some people think that it is a good thing,while others argue that it is not suitable. Discuss both these views and give your opinion.

People have different views about whether the important jobs in the government could be managed by young individuals or not. While it is true that young people are eager for contributing, I believe that this type of job is more suitable for the seniors.

On the one hand, young politicians are better apprentices and pioneers. They have a higher ability to learn and gather information. For example, there are a large amount of researches done by young politicians before the US congress announces new laws of lower taxes. The next reason for choosing young people is that they approach all problems in a new way of thinking and provide innovated solutions. They usually put first steps to the new problems before the seniors decide to have look. That is the reason we call them “Pioneers”.

On the other hand, there are several reasons that older people is more suitable for these positions. Firstly, they have more experience with difficult and bigger problems which the young politicians cannot deal with efficiently. Because they have encountered a lot of issues, seniors are proved to have a clearer look at those situation. Secondly, older people tend to do less mistakes than young ones. Although they could not compete with young politicians on the amount of work and time, seniors slowly choose the best solutions for the country. So in my opinion, for the stability of a nation, I would prefer old politicians to young ones because the youngs are not ready and suitable for the job.

In conclusion, I believe that it is not a bad thing for young people taking important roles in the government. However, these individuals are not suitable for these jobs at the moment.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 164, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'amounts'?
Suggestion: amounts
...rmation. For example, there are a large amount of researches done by young politicians...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 346, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a new way" with adverb for "new"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...ople is that they approach all problems in a new way of thinking and provide innovated solut...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 322, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this situation' or 'those situations'?
Suggestion: this situation; those situations
...rs are proved to have a clearer look at those situation. Secondly, older people tend to do less...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 373, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun mistakes is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...tion. Secondly, older people tend to do less mistakes than young ones. Although they...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, look, second, secondly, so, while, for example, in conclusion, in my opinion, it is true, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1415.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 285.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.9649122807 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10876417139 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76949482211 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.529824561404 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 437.4 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.4918144126 49.4020404114 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.4375 106.682146367 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8125 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.8125 7.06120827912 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.204307769191 0.244688304435 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0749319336808 0.084324248473 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0693305701174 0.0667982634062 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.149045060913 0.151304729494 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0546293990698 0.056905535591 96% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.0946893788 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 50.2224549098 125% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.3001002004 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.19 12.4159519038 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.8 8.58950901804 91% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 78.4519038076 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.