Nowadays we are producing more and more rubbish. Why do you think this is happening? What can governments do to help reduce the amount of rubbish produced?
The increasing amount of waste and the waste management has become one of the pressing issues in the current era, throughout the world. This essay will discuss further on the reason for the rise in rubbish and which measures the governments could adopt to curtail the vast amount of trash produced in the following paragraphs with examples.
Firstly, the rising rate of consumerism is major reason for the high amount of wastage produced due to increasing incomes as well as higher amount of cash at disposal. Before a thing wears out or even on negligible usage, people are quick to throw it out citing the cause of it becoming old-fashioned or obsolete. This kind of wastage may be in the form of electronics, clothes, plastic or even food. Not realising that many of these products could be reused, but some of the trash like plastic are non-recyclable wastes. Like for example America is currently dealing with issues of waste management due to the soaring rates of consumerism. This trash crisis is responsible for impairing public health, polluting the environment and threatening to drown some poor countries in toxicity.
The following measures would certainly help in tackling waste management issue. One way that the government can help alleviate this burden on the environment is by educating the public. By promoting the use of reusable bags when shopping, the number of plastic bags can be greatly reduced. Another step that the government may undertake is through sound recycling measures on a larger extent. For instance, look at Singapore, it is regarded as the cleanest city of Asia, because of strict laws of littering being enforced by the government. In addition, almost all of Singapore’s non-recyclable waste is burnt to form ash and this waste is further shipped to a man-made island nearby that doubles as a nature reserve. We can surely take Singapore as role model and construct a similar structure to dispose of its waste.
In conclusion, it is a fact that the human population, consumerism and industrialization will continue to rise. For the world’s natural resources remain sustainable, the governments around the world and the public must cooperate to arrest the ever-present problem of growing rubbish.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-20 | Ahmedmamdouhamin | 84 | view |
| 2019-08-20 | noen | 84 | view |
| 2019-07-24 | seby0406 | 56 | view |
| 2019-03-31 | Vaman Randhawa | 84 | view |
| 2019-03-09 | Saira Faiz | 61 | view |
- Some people say that government should give priority to health care whereas others say they should spend on other important priorities Discuss both views and give your opinion 83
- Some people spend a lot of money on tickets to go to sporting or cultural events.Do you think this is positive or negative development? 73
- Some people believe that studying at university or college is the best route to a successful career, while others believe that it is better to get a job straight after the school. Discuss both views and give your opinion? 89
- Marriages are bigger and more expensive nowadays than in the past. Why is this the case? Is it a negative or positive development? 84
- Some people think that illegal internet downloads are having a negative effect on the music industry Others feel that they have little or no impact on the artist Discuss both views and give your opinion 69
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 248, Rule ID: ADOPT_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'adapt to'?
Suggestion: adapt to
...nd which measures the governments could adopt to curtail the vast amount of trash produc...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 465, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
... of these products could be reused, but some of the trash like plastic are non-recyclable w...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, look, may, so, well, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, kind of, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 41.998997996 138% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1890.0 1615.20841683 117% => OK
No of words: 366.0 315.596192385 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.16393442623 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37391431897 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96621162743 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 176.041082164 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.560109289617 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 588.6 506.74238477 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.6696720372 49.4020404114 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.176470588 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5294117647 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.82352941176 7.06120827912 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.138026660586 0.244688304435 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0403094285212 0.084324248473 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0456428301734 0.0667982634062 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.085348999245 0.151304729494 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0346109413633 0.056905535591 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.04 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 78.4519038076 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.