Once children start school,teachers have more influence on their intellectual and social development.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It maintains as a hotly-debated topic whether the teachers or parents have a greater impact on childrens’ intellectual and social characteristics. In my opinion, while the teacher’s guidance throughout education sharpens their intelligence, the parents seem to impact their children’s social ability due to a larger amount of time they spend exchanging interpersonal interactions.
To begin with, most kids’ intelligence is considerably affected by their teachers as teachers are the ones giving them orientations in learning. Indeed, since students’ first day at school, under teachers’ guidance, the children can understand lessons and acquire logical skills. In Vietnam, for instance, in order to improve childrens’ average IQ, the government implemented programs improving teachers’ ability. Higher-quality teachers subsequently could convey lessons better and organise more activities to enhance students’ cognitive ability. Hence, the later research demonstrated an increase in students’ intellectual ability. The programs in Vietnam are a salient example of how great the teacher’s influence on children’s intelligence is.
On the other hand, the parental role is proven to be significant to the children’s social development as parents clearly spend more time socialising with kids. In fact, while children mainly accompany their teachers in academics, parents are generally the ones coupling with them in different social situations. Take me as an example, most of my social manners are comparable to those of my parents. My friendliness is the result of the many times my mom insisted on its importance to build new relationships. It is clear that many kids, like me, are influenced by their parents due to a large amount of time in various social situations.
In conclusion, for the reasons outlined above, in addition to the need for teachers ' involvement in terms of intelligence, children also need parental guidance in developing social ability to become a respectable resident in the future.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-11-08 | lannie1124 | 78 | view |
| 2019-12-07 | Aesha0312 | 87 | view |
- Some people believe that children should be banned from using their phones during the school day Others believe that children should be allowed to use their phones Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 84
- Studies suggest that many teenagers these days prefer socialising online to meeting one another in person Why do you think this is the case What measures could be taken to encourage teenagers to spend more time meeting one another in person 78
- Which is the most important cultural identifier or the feature that defines your cultural identity 95
- Computers are often argued to be the most important invention of the last hundred years To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 84
- Many people say the gap between rich and poor people is wider as rich people become richer and poor people grow poorer What problems could this situation cause and what measures can be done to address those problems 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 84, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ve, in addition to the need for teachers involvement in terms of intelligence, ch...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, hence, if, so, while, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, in my opinion, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 7.30460921844 14% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1740.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 302.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.76158940397 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1687104957 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.3477459856 2.80592935109 119% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.569536423841 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 529.2 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 4.76152304609 231% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.3794952973 49.4020404114 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.285714286 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5714285714 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.5 7.06120827912 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.263070361365 0.244688304435 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0916511876881 0.084324248473 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0462675244792 0.0667982634062 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.154430839694 0.151304729494 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0369947791957 0.056905535591 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 13.0946893788 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 50.2224549098 66% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.13 12.4159519038 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.65 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.