Ordinary people try to copy famous personalities by seeing them on TV or reading about them in the newspapers.What is the reason for this?Is it a good idea to copy famous personalities?When new town are planned, it is important to build more public parks

Essay topics:

Ordinary people try to copy famous personalities by seeing them on TV or reading about them in the newspapers.

What is the reason for this?

Is it a good idea to copy famous personalities?

When new town are planned, it is important to build more public parks and sports facilities, rather than shopping centres for people to spend their free time. To what extend do you agree or disagree?

Whether communal parks and sports facilities should be considered preferable to shopping centres planning new towns has always been a matter of vigorous debates. some people are in favour, whereas others tend to contradict them. I am inclined to concur with the former, which will be elaborated in this essay.

To begin with, contemporary huge metropolises suffocating in smog has proved to be in need of parks with their lush vegetation. Numerous factories, which are in abundance in modern industrial centres, emit tons of fumes seriously contaminating the atmosphere. In this regard, parks, lungs of the Earth, probably one of the most feasible means of counteracting the issue. Furthermore, walks in the fresh air and playing sports may also be a viable ways to stay healthy and in a good fit, taking into consideration the pervasive spread of sedentary way of life nowadays. people, these days, not having an excess of leisure time, do not seem to be ready to spend time travelling to parks which are not in close proximity.

On the contrary, some people tend to claim that exorbitant prices on land may be a serious obstacle for building parks and it seems to be much more lucrative to use it for housing. such businessmen and entrepreneurs always seek how to gain extra profit not foreseeing possible detriment for the posterity. Another aspect might be that parks require constant maintenance and thus significant expenditures. Funds for these facilities may require the imposition of extra levies on city dwellers, which sometimes may be opposed.

All in all, although certain negative aspects of public parks and sports facilities are cited, I would claim that pollution of the environment and health issues, which such facilities are designed to counteract, should always be given the first precedence.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-12-10 aringa 84 view
2019-11-16 awsrabinpoudel@gmail.com 84 view
2019-08-02 manas 61 view
Essays by user aringa :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 163, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Some
...ways been a matter of vigorous debates. some people are in favour, whereas others te...
^^^^
Line 7, column 448, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'way'?
Suggestion: way
...and playing sports may also be a viable ways to stay healthy and in a good fit, taki...
^^^^
Line 7, column 570, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: People
...read of sedentary way of life nowadays. people, these days, not having an excess of le...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 703, Rule ID: CLOSE_SCRUTINY[1]
Message: Use simply 'proximity'.
Suggestion: proximity
...me travelling to parks which are not in close proximity. On the contrary, some people t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 182, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Such
...h more lucrative to use it for housing. such businessmen and entrepreneurs always se...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, furthermore, if, may, so, thus, well, whereas, on the contrary, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1549.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 295.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.25084745763 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87908983671 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.623728813559 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 468.9 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.2066046464 49.4020404114 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.153846154 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6923076923 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.92307692308 7.06120827912 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0973483411958 0.244688304435 40% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0352790103851 0.084324248473 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0302130014237 0.0667982634062 45% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0605859287912 0.151304729494 40% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0297796705659 0.056905535591 52% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.47 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.17 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.