Recently, in today's world, many individuals switch between different companies. Some assert that these kinds of changes shall be considered as a positive action. Admittedly, I absolutely agree with this statement owing to a number of compelling reasons.
To begin with, we can see a trend nowadays that many people attend universities in order to find a better job in the future. They, finally, graduate with a little to zero job experience. Therefore, having a little experience, these people have to start from a relatively small company and apply for junior positions. Then, little by little, they can build up their resumes and, with the experience they gain, they, eventually apply for big and international companies and also higher paid positions. Rather than, staying with one company over the years and end up being a supervisor of a small company.
Yet another compelling justification is that when changing their jobs, people can learn new techniques and not only focusing on one subject. To put it differently, by getting hired in a new job position, they are bound to learn new things. Take an engineer, whose practical experience is entirely within one software program; the move to a new position could potentially broaden both his training and experience. Instead of sitting in a company and do a routine and day to day normal job, he would be able to be promoted to a well-qualified engineer just by changing his job periodically.
To sum up, considering the points discussed above, the most rational conclusion to be drawn is that, shifting between careers most of the times would lead to positive outcomes. Therefore, I strongly support switching jobs frequently.
- A growing number of people feel that animals should to be exploited by people and they should have the same rights as humans, while others argue that humans must employ animals to satisfy their various needs, including uses for food and research discuss b 73
- Some people think that people moving to a new country should accept new culture in the foreign country. Others think that they should live as a separate minority group with different lifestyle. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 58
- Television is dangerous because it destroys family life and any sense of community instead of visiting people or talking with our family we jus watch television To what extend do you agree or disagree with this opinion 75
- Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 87
- Some people claim that public museums and art galleries are not needed because people can see historical objects and works of art using a computer Do you agree with this opinion 87
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, if, so, then, therefore, well, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1421.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 276.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.14855072464 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07593519647 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92410833893 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.641304347826 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 441.0 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.7784992724 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.5 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7142857143 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 7.06120827912 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.202983925946 0.244688304435 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0651595243042 0.084324248473 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0486438833689 0.0667982634062 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109296220712 0.151304729494 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0381809886491 0.056905535591 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.0946893788 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.59 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.76 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.