It is generally claimed that History is so important that every student ought to be major in it: however, others argue that other subjects are more vital for the children. Although I fairly agree that other subjects are essential for today children, this essay will discuss and examine both points of view.
Numerous people believe that studying history prevent possible problem and mistakes. This is due to the fact that one generally makes a better decision, if he/she encountered a similar situation before. In other word, by learning history, it allows people to understand past events; as a result, they can apply these knowledge to avoid committing a protential mistake. For instance, humans learned many lessons from the WWII, so the vast majority of nations came up with a number of measures to prevent the next conflict. Thus, this illustrates the power of understanding history and sufficiently explain why many people persuade their children to study history as a major subject?
On the other hand, other people and I believe that other academic courses can effectively develop children critical thinking. Some subjects such as math and computer significantly contribute children’s logical thinking process to be optimized. Enrolling such difficult courses which require students to become intelligent by stimulating their brain development. Additionally, all children should have freedom to choose whatever they love and want to specialize in for their future career. Finally, I believe that every people have his/her own list of favorites, so why should we limit them by forcing to study for a specific subject?
To conclude, although studying history contains some advantages, the positives from learning other subjects are imperative. Therefore, I firmly believe that if children take other courses, they will not become well-informed but also have an opportunity to choose in their preferred area.
- Task 2: Many museums and historical sites are mainly visited by tourists but not local people. Why is this the case and what can be done to attract more local people to visit these places? 78
- The two pie charts below show some employment patterns in Great Britain in 1992.Employees and self-employed: by sex and occupation, 1992 11
- The charts below show the percentage of their food budget the average family spent on restaurant meals in different years. The graph shows the number of meals eaten in fast food restaurants and sit-down restaurants.You should write at least 150 words. 67
- The charts below give Information on the ages of the populations of Yemen and Italy In 2000 and projections for 2050.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 58
- The graphs below give information about computer ownership as a percentage of the population between 2002 and 2010, and by level of education for the years 2002 and 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comp 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 312, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this knowledge' or 'these knowledges'?
Suggestion: this knowledge; these knowledges
...ast events; as a result, they can apply these knowledge to avoid committing a protential mistak...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 289, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nity to choose in their preferred area.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, however, if, so, therefore, thus, well, for instance, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 24.0651302605 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1629.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 299.0 315.596192385 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.44816053512 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1583189471 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82737498107 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.605351170569 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 513.0 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 23.3906487507 49.4020404114 47% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 116.357142857 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3571428571 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.07142857143 7.06120827912 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.416841632412 0.244688304435 170% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.13448512823 0.084324248473 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0913054132915 0.0667982634062 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.257289993619 0.151304729494 170% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0920009779242 0.056905535591 162% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.33 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.69 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.