Some people say that now we can see films on our phones or tablets there is no need to go to cinema. Others say that to be fully enjoyed, films need to be seen in cinema.
Discuss both views and give your opinion.
The past decade has witnessed bewildering technology change, with a proliferation of internet and smartphones the question has aroused on the existence of cinema. Nowadays, some people argue if one can watch movies on smartphones and tablets then why we need cinema halls? On the other hand, I support the group who claims that only cinema halls can give the best experience of movies.
To begin with, watching a movie on personal gadgets is economical than going to the cinema, with a mere initial investment one can enjoy countless movies. To illustrate, buying a monthly subscription of Netfix for $9 one can watch 100+ movies over a month which equates to the cost of only one show in the cinema hall. Secondly, unlike cinema, watching films on mobile devices provide flexibility to viewers. Depending on the interest of time, one can enjoy audio-visual at a stretch or watch it in parts. In addition, the recent improvements to audio-visual features in smartphones are applauded and accepted by people. Considering these facts, some people prefer to enjoy a film on their personal devices over going to the cinema.
On the flip side, though it is convenient to watch a movie on a small screen, it can not give the mesmerizing experience that one can enjoy in a theater with perfect acoustics and widescreen. Furthermore, smartphones do not support 3D or 4D movies. In order to enjoy these types of pictures, one is obliged to visit the theater. Furthermore, cinema halls allow a large group to sit and enjoy together, providing noteworthy opportunity to socialize with other people during intervals, whereas watching movies on cell phones is considered as a monotonous activity. Also, the box office trend shows that people still prefer to watch movies in the theater. Seen under this light, cinema halls provide uninterrupted and great enjoyment to the audience.
To sum up, although people started considering their phones and tablets as another source for watching movies and films, these gadgets can not compete with the life-like experience in the cinema hall. Thus watching films in cinema halls can never be outdated.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-05 | rm21co | 56 | view |
| 2019-11-30 | wildhog.tejwani@gmail.com | 78 | view |
| 2019-11-30 | wildhog.tejwani@gmail.com | 67 | view |
| 2019-11-30 | wildhog.tejwani@gmail.com | 67 | view |
| 2019-11-15 | Pallchau | 73 | view |
- A colleague gave you a book which you used for your presentation. Write a letter to your colleague.In your letter, you should say:what the presentation was about,why the presentation was importanthow the book helped you. 84
- Write a letter to your friend who is moving to a new home You have time to help her How can you help her move Ask questions about new home 72
- Some people say that now we can see films on our phones or tablets there is no need to go to cinema. Others say that to be fully enjoyed, films need to be seen in cinema.Discuss both views and give your opinion. 73
- Many working people get little ot no exercise either during the working day or in their free time and have health problems as a result.Why do many workin people not get enough exercise?What can be done about this problem? 89
- You are a member of a sport club Write a letter to the club president about an event that will be organized In your letter you should tell what it is who I am inviting what my role is in this event 51
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 214, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ing a monthly subscription of Netfix for one can watch 100+ movies over a month w...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, if, second, secondly, so, still, then, thus, whereas, in addition, to begin with, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 41.998997996 143% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1792.0 1615.20841683 111% => OK
No of words: 350.0 315.596192385 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32530772707 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80018075218 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.514285714286 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 560.7 506.74238477 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.76152304609 210% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.4891550806 49.4020404114 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.411764706 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5882352941 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.58823529412 7.06120827912 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.215773877224 0.244688304435 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0816731663097 0.084324248473 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0692136944557 0.0667982634062 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.156997375637 0.151304729494 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0452738803511 0.056905535591 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.19 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.