Some people think certain prisoners should be made to do unpaid community work instead of being put behind bars.
To what extent do you agree?
Two days ago, I read an article about implementing community work in the justice system. Some lawyers claimed that judges should extensively use it making verdicts. This essay agrees with this point of view for the following reasons.
The first reason is that community service is more beneficial for society than confinement. The labor market has many jobs that experience a shortage of employees. Therefore, if the convict with petty crime had the chance to do a certain job for free instead of imprisoment, then they would benefit the public because their contribution would be voluntary as well as cover unpopular occupations. For example, in karaganda city, the convicted often receive community work, such as sweeping main streets, painting the fences in the park and picking liter in the backyards.
Another reason why unpaid jobs should be an option as a verdict is that the convict with minor offences should not rub shoulders with more serious criminals. Punished for the pickpocketing and shoplifting, a prisoner may learn from either serial killers or bank robbers how to commit more serious crimes after the sentence in jail. Thus, it is important to separate them apart instead of imprisoning together by offering community work for minor crimes as a form of penalty. For instance, the police department, in Almaty city, has registered the number of major crimes as soon as the justice system have taken unpaid as a penalty for minor crimes.
However, some prosecutors believe that offenders should have the opportunity to pay their crimes by doing community work. The main argument for this point of view is that they are more likely to break the law again. They say that criminals should be imprisoned, no matter whether the crime is petty, because prison will help them understand the consequences. Despite this, every convicted should not be sent to prison, as the government would have to build more prisons to accommodate all of them.
In conclusion, judges should consider community work as a measure of punishment for minor crimes, since it is profitable for both the public and helpful for some criminals to avoid meeting more serious criminals in jail.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-04-03 | Tolik | 84 | view |
| 2019-04-03 | Tolik | 78 | view |
| 2019-04-03 | Tolik | 78 | view |
| 2019-01-03 | VishvAdthakkar | 56 | view |
| 2019-01-03 | VishvAdthakkar | 73 | view |
- Your neighbours have recently written to you to complain about the noise from your house/ flat.Write a letter to your neighbours. In your letterexplain the reasons for the noiseapologisedescribe what action you will take 73
- The best way to improve health is to exercise daily To what extent do you agree 52
- Every country should have a free health service, even if this means that the latest medical treatments may not be available through the service because they are too expensive.To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- Some people claim that there are more disadvantages of the car than its advantages. Do you agree or disagree? 78
- Some employers want to be able to contact their staff all times, especially holidays. Does this development have more advantages than disadvantages? 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, may, so, then, therefore, thus, well, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1831.0 1615.20841683 113% => OK
No of words: 358.0 315.596192385 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11452513966 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34981470047 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67893405694 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 176.041082164 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.569832402235 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 567.0 506.74238477 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.8312386335 49.4020404114 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.4375 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.375 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.75 7.06120827912 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.20242723925 0.244688304435 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0673637234842 0.084324248473 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0502253566914 0.0667982634062 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115644332738 0.151304729494 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0419420173524 0.056905535591 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.61 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.