Some people think that foreign visitors should be charged more than locals when they visit cultural and tourist attractions in a country. To what extent do you agree with this view?
Nowadays, tourism is considered the main source of revenue for many nations. Some school of thought believe that citizens from other nations should be charged more than indigenous for their visit to traditional places. I am in consummate discord with this argument. I will elaborate it in detail in the upcoming paragraphs.
To commence with, this step can affect the tourism industry negatively because some tourist travel on budget and they have limited money while traveling. Extra charge will make them unwilling to visit any monument and they will never plan any trip to that country again. To exemplify, expensive countries such as United State of America and Canada charge a hefty amount for entry fee to any museum or historic building that is why these countries are less popular among vacationers instead they choose Indonesia and Malaysia because of the low cost.Therefore, it would not be beneficial for the growth of any nation.
Furthermore, commuters already pay a lot of money for visa process. All costs should be included in that fees. They should be allowed to visit any places with free of cost. It will attract more foreigners and more people will visit the country. For instance, in France, visitors can go to any historical place and enter without paying any money. They just need to show their passport for identification purposes. Every year millions of people visit France because of this facility. Therefore, it promotes the tourism and earns the fame for the country as well.
To sum up, the charges of visiting to any place for foreigners should be free or same as locals. The increased amount with have adverse effects on the tourism industry. It can hamper the economy of nations which are totally dependent on it.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-06-04 | Rachana91 | 56 | view |
| 2020-04-17 | somu | 89 | view |
| 2020-04-08 | ronak65767 | 73 | view |
| 2020-04-08 | ronak65767 | 67 | view |
| 2020-03-04 | roshikabir | 56 | view |
- Tourism is becoming increasingly important as a source of revenue to many countries but its disadvantages should not be overlooked To what extent do you agree or disagree 67
- More and more companies are allowing employees to work at home Do you think this is a positive or negative development 67
- Some people think that strict punishments for driving offences are the key to reducing traffic accidents Others however believe that other measures would be more effective in improving road safety Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 73
- Television has changed the quality of life for the ordinary person Do you agree or disagree 66
- Throughout history people have dreamed about perfect society but they have not agreed what an ideal society is What do you think the most important elements to have perfect society in the modern world How people can achieve an ideal society 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 550, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Therefore
...ia and Malaysia because of the low cost.Therefore, it would not be beneficial for the gro...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, so, therefore, well, while, for instance, such as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1463.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 292.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0102739726 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13376432452 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57006116521 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.595890410959 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 465.3 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 67.0723075825 49.4020404114 136% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.2777777778 106.682146367 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.2222222222 20.7667163134 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.27777777778 7.06120827912 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 3.4128256513 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.262028246763 0.244688304435 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0817605199112 0.084324248473 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0686544202895 0.0667982634062 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.163973863832 0.151304729494 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0322561462333 0.056905535591 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 13.0946893788 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.48 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.65 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.