Some people think that mobile phones are harmful for children while others disagree Discuss both sides and give your opinion

Essay topics:

Some people think that mobile phones are harmful for children, while others disagree
Discuss both sides and give your opinion.

With technological advancement, smart devices are becoming more available to everyone, especially children. Although these gadgets bring great utility for human life, it is believed that they can be harmful to youngsters while others disagree with this statement. In my viewpoint, it can be dangerous if we let our kids use these portable devices without any restrictions. I shall demonstrate my ideas in the following paragraph.

Parents who support the use of mobile phone may argue that it can help them keep in contact with their children while they are out of school. For example, many students tend to join extra activities after their class in various locations and telephones may be the perfect way to help families connect to them in emergency situations. Moreover, using these portable appliances may be a great alternative learning options compare to traditional books as youngsters can access education materials or attending lectures at any time. For instance, during the Covid lockdown, many schools have switched to online lectures which have made tablets or smart devices become common among children for their learning.

On the other hand, overexposure to smart gadgets may make users become addicted and cause detrimental effects on health. Kids may become dependent users if they play on these devices too often, which may lead to the reduction of physical activities and eye problems. Some parents today apply tablets or phones as a source of distraction to their children so they can have more spare time and focus on their works. This may be initially effective, however, in the longer term, this trend can change social behaviour and make toddlers feel inactive or refuse to play with others. Additionally, popular applications such as Facebook, messenger or Instagram have become very popular, which can be compatible on mobile devices. As a result, students can easily access these applications through their phones during class and neglect lectures at schools, which eventually reduce their concentration and learning outcomes. To avoid this, some universities have restricted the use of cell phones during study time.

To sum up, technology has undoubtedly brought great benefits for human, however, unlimited use of these inventions may underline potential drawbacks to younger generations.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2022-01-07 lakhveer khokhar 84 view
2020-08-12 nahal 59 view
2019-11-24 alex2019 70 view
2019-11-20 Milan Desai 79 view
2019-09-12 Sneha k 89 view
Essays by user lakhveer khokhar :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 5, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
With technological advancement, smart devices...
^^
Line 1, column 118, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... everyone, especially children. Although these gadgets bring great utility for hu...
^^
Line 5, column 763, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... As a result, students can easily access these applications through their phones ...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, may, moreover, so, while, for example, for instance, such as, as a result, in my view, to sum up, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 7.85571142285 216% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 24.0651302605 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1965.0 1615.20841683 122% => OK
No of words: 363.0 315.596192385 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.4132231405 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3649236973 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79685832705 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 212.0 176.041082164 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.584022038567 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 612.9 506.74238477 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.1321202368 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.8125 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6875 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 7.06120827912 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.121955062429 0.244688304435 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0433853210532 0.084324248473 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0454650090663 0.0667982634062 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0750742235869 0.151304729494 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.02903691414 0.056905535591 51% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.56 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 78.4519038076 141% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.