Some people think that the teenagers should concentrate on all subjects at school. Others believe that teenagers should focus on subject they are best at or they are most interested in. To what extent do you agree?
It is obvious that investing in education is investing in one’s future. While other people believe that teenagers should concentrate on chosen subjects, I would argue that it is more beneficial to study a wide range of subjects at school.
Studying all subjects has a positive effect on their future in various ways. First, without studying all subjects at school, it is impossible for students to pursue higher education at university or college. This is due to the fact that most universities require a certain number of credits from high school. Secondly, all subjects at school, including maths, history and language, are valued for their future career. After graduating from high school, students will be able to find a job and apply their knowledge into the workplace. For example, to become a tour guide, he or she has a wide knowledge of history, which can be acquired at high school.
On the other hand, many people claim that teenagers should focus on studying their favourite subjects. The reason is that there would be less burden on teenagers and they, therefore, would put a lot of effort learning and master those subjects. Perhaps, it is partially true. However, some of them would choose easy subjects to learn and ignore the rest of them. For example, art is likely to consider as an unchallenging subject due to there is not much theory to learn, whereas maths is a quite challenging subject with statistics or numbers.
In conclusion, for the reasons mentioned above, it seems to me that students are more likely to be beneficial in the long term if they study all subjects at school.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-11-17 | vyhoang1992 | 61 | view |
- New technologies have changed the way children spend their free time. Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages? 73
- In many countries, very few young people read newspapers or follow the news on TV. What do you think are the causes of this? What solutions can you suggest? 67
- Some people claim that it is the responsibility of some individuals to protect environment, while others consider that the government should take the main responsibility. Discuss both views 67
- The high sales of popular consumer goods reflect the power of advertising but not the real need of the society where such products are sold do. To what extend do you agree or disagree? 61
- Many museums and historical sites are mainly visited by tourists, but not local people. Why this is the case? What can be done to attract more local people to visit these places? 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, whereas, while, for example, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1342.0 1615.20841683 83% => OK
No of words: 273.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.91575091575 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06481385082 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64054041358 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.56043956044 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 405.9 506.74238477 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.4555420178 49.4020404114 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.8571428571 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.14285714286 7.06120827912 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.331869429735 0.244688304435 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106975776297 0.084324248473 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0880820314834 0.0667982634062 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.201606556284 0.151304729494 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0336162333612 0.056905535591 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.0946893788 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 12.4159519038 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.99 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 78.4519038076 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.