What are the pros and cons of traveling first class and backpacking?
Different travel styles can completely change your experience. We can visit the same places, but depend on the travel style, to discover different parts of puzzle. We will taste different meat, will meet another people and will not feel the same emotions. Every type of traveling has the pros and cos. People should try them all before deciding what is right for them.
The most popular travel style is backpacking. The main advantage is whole trip is according to your pace only. You own decide where and when to have stopping. You choose how long to stay alone with nature and when to return to civilization. Another, but not less nice pros is the cheapness. You can sleep under tent or to stay at the cheap hostels. You can eat simple local food or to hunt small animals or to fish, or collect fruits or mushrooms. Also, you don’t limited of time and destination. You can dive nature totally. The con is you must have planning and research before starting your trip. Also you depend of weather. In addition you carry everything you need on your back. You risk to lose something or to be robbed.
Definitely another kind of experience is travelling first class. In the most cases, your journey will be plan by professional tour company or guides. They will care to maximal comfort and convenience. You shouldn’t worry about rating of service in Hotels and restaurants, logistic and transportation. Also they will ensure you safety. They will pamper you totally. The main disadvantage of that pleasure is its cost. Most of the people can’t allow so high paying for the rest. And if they do it, they can’t enjoy the rest because of thinking about the money spent.
On my opinion every travel style offers you different kind of experience, so everyone can find the right one for him.
- Animals should have the same rights as the rest. Do you agree? 56
- Many newspapers and magazines feature stories about the private lives of famous people. We know what they eat, where they buy their clothes and who they love. We also often see pictures of them in private situations.Is it appropriate for a magazine or new 61
- Genetic engineering is a damaging trend. it should be limited. to what extent do you agree? 84
- Some scientists think that there are intelligent life forms on their planets and messages should be sent to contact them Other scientists think it is a bad idea and would be dangerous Discuss both views and give your own opinion 76
- What are the keys to a successful family?What things can family do together to strengthen the family relationship? 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 606, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...and research before starting your trip. Also you depend of weather. In addition you ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 637, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: addition,
...ur trip. Also you depend of weather. In addition you carry everything you need on your b...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 694, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'risk losing'.
Suggestion: risk losing
...y everything you need on your back. You risk to lose something or to be robbed. Definitel...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 307, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...staurants, logistic and transportation. Also they will ensure you safety. They will ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, so, in addition, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 7.85571142285 229% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 19.0 10.4138276553 182% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 34.0 24.0651302605 141% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1502.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 312.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.8141025641 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20279927342 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5629163923 2.80592935109 91% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 176.041082164 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.586538461538 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 459.0 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 5.43587174349 258% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 28.0 16.0721442886 174% => OK
Sentence length: 11.0 20.2975951904 54% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 24.1140995253 49.4020404114 49% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 53.6428571429 106.682146367 50% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 11.1428571429 20.7667163134 54% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 1.64285714286 7.06120827912 23% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 14.0 3.4128256513 410% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.113843338843 0.244688304435 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0345428758384 0.084324248473 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0656049453826 0.0667982634062 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0682780719479 0.151304729494 45% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0335401493825 0.056905535591 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 6.8 13.0946893788 52% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.77 50.2224549098 137% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.4 11.3001002004 57% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 9.43 12.4159519038 76% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.42 8.58950901804 86% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 78.4519038076 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 4.5 9.78957915832 46% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 6.4 10.1190380762 63% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 10.7795591182 65% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.