Because people are busy doing so many different things, they do very few things well.
It is a well-known fact that the people have gained more spare time than before. Although, initially, it may seem simple, writitng about this complex and controversial topic is not very convenient, because in which multifarious criteria come together as affecting agents. Even though some might allegate the statement, but I disagree with it. To illusrate my perspective of the subject, I will vindicate two reasons in the following article.
The first dimension of the topic to point out is that the number of the children have been alleviated drastically. Despite having more life facilities, it is an indisputable fact that families wanted less children. what's more, by means a very tangible example with which can exemplify this issue is that my granfather had ten kids, but my aunts and uncles have one or at its maximun two kids. It is a widely accepted that the less kids you have, the less time you need to spend on their problems. So, It can be inferred that peolple have more time to concentrate on their tasks and achieve more progressions.
In approaching this issue , apart from the fact mentioned above, one should consider another subtle point meticulously that technological developments have made our life much more easier in so many aspects. It is inevitability undeniable that new equipments profoundly and ceaselessly affected the time we spent on some daily tasks. In addressing causation and pro and cons of the subject, in 2018, a comprehensive and thorough research was done by a group of MIT scholars. the results objectively revealed that the people have gained many helps to do their jobs or personal activities, as a result, they could be more effective in almost most of their occupations. So, not only do the people have more focus, but also they have better outcomes.
In a word, by considering the coincidence the two presented reasons with refrable facts, we may draw the conclusion that the great outcomes of the people actions are commendably lucid, due to the less family occupation and more help from technology. Although the effect amplitude of the suject varies from minor to major spectrum, and more investigation is required to determine the other involved factors.
- Teachers were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they were nowadays. 90
- Imagine that you are in a classroom or a meeting. The teacher or the meeting leader says something incorrect In your opinion, which of the following is the best thing to do? -Interrupt and correct the mistake right away -Wait until the class or meeting is 3
- Imagine that you are in a classroom or a meeting. The teacher or the meeting leader says something incorrect In your opinion, which of the following is the best thing to do?-Interrupt and correct the mistake right away-Wait until the class or meeting is o 3
- Some people believe that when busy parents do not have a lot of time to spend with their children, the best use of that time is to have fun playing games or sports. Other believe that it is best to use that time doing things together that are related to s 86
- In the past, young people depended too much on their parents to make decisions for them; today young people are better able to make decisions about their own lives. 86
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 200, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun children is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
... indisputable fact that families wanted less children. whats more, by means a very t...
^^^^
Line 2, column 215, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Whats
...act that families wanted less children. whats more, by means a very tangible example ...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 215, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: what's
...act that families wanted less children. whats more, by means a very tangible example ...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 426, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun kids is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
... kids. It is a widely accepted that the less kids you have, the less time you need t...
^^^^
Line 2, column 577, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... more time to concentrate on their tasks and achieve more progressions. In appro...
^^
Line 3, column 26, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...progressions. In approaching this issue , apart from the fact mentioned above, on...
^^
Line 3, column 176, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'easier' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: easier
...al developments have made our life much more easier in so many aspects. It is inevitability...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 474, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...ch was done by a group of MIT scholars. the results objectively revealed that the p...
^^^
Line 3, column 718, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... do the people have more focus, but also they have better outcomes. In a word, ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, so, well, apart from, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 43.0788530466 86% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 52.1666666667 84% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1843.0 1977.66487455 93% => OK
No of words: 366.0 407.700716846 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.03551912568 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37391431897 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87239473277 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 218.0 212.727598566 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.595628415301 0.524837075471 113% => OK
syllable_count: 583.2 618.680645161 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.8710072143 48.9658058833 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.1875 100.406767564 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.875 20.6045352989 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.75 5.45110844103 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 5.5376344086 163% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.124279691266 0.236089414692 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0388807586709 0.076458572812 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0579808230242 0.0737576698707 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0712966016168 0.150856017488 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0593299221232 0.0645574589148 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 11.7677419355 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 58.1214874552 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.25 10.9000537634 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.17 8.01818996416 114% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 86.8835125448 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 86.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.