Cars will decrease.
Nowadays, it is pretty straightforward that the most used mean of transportation is cars, and this has ample amount of reasons. However, most believe that with the development of the technology, people will stop using cars for their daily basis. I assume that this concept is biased, and nothing will have potential to eliminate the popularity of car usage.
Firstly, I consider that it is impossible to develop a specific technology in twenty years which will be as effective as cars. Because, in contemporary world, as a mankind, we are not developed in that level to create a certain technology, in that short period. Moreover, scientists and engineers are working on some innovations which could be much more beneficial for us, rather than creating a new mean of transport. I assume that the main reason for thinking in this way is that people have already comprehended the concept of using cars, as the most profitable one. Consequently, as a society, in my opinion, it should be much more advantageous to work on specific fields which are more important.
Secondly, with the significant growth of the population which inhabits the Earth, it is quite straightforward that the interest of buying cars rising too. Indeed, the majority of the people who live in developed countries are thriving for buying an expensive and fancy car for themselves. And I consider this concept as a normal human desire. Because, based on my personal life, all of the people who I have encountered had a tendency to buy a car, and by growing in this environment, my thought are quite same. To be more precise, there are millions of people who think in this way, and their goals are same. Consequently, with the enormous quantity of people who have motivation to buy this mean of transport, it is quite comprehendable that the amount of cars will rise tremendously, and stopping this worldwide event is very challanging.
In conclusion, I consider the concept of decreasement of cars in next twenty years, as a wrong mindset, and also, I assume that conversely, the amount of people who will use this mean of transport will grow significantly.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-07-19 | Uttama Shekhawat | 76 | view |
| 2022-07-19 | Uttama Shekhawat | 76 | view |
| 2019-11-09 | musakhan | 60 | view |
| 2019-05-13 | Milipatel | 73 | view |
| 2019-01-31 | Nicat | 73 | view |
- Agree or disagree with the following statement:Standardized tests like the TOEFL provide sufficient information to determine whether students should be admitted to a college or university. 70
- Read and think about the following statement: The college years are the best time in a person’s life. Do you agree or disagree with this statement? Give reasons to support your opinion. 66
- Life today is easier and comfortable than the childhood of your grandparents.Do you agree or disagree? 66
- Distance learning and online computer classes should replace classroom learning.Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? 70
- Extended family 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 380, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...re. Because, based on my personal life, all of the people who I have encountered had a ten...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, conversely, first, firstly, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, in conclusion, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 20.0 11.0286738351 181% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 43.0788530466 93% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 52.1666666667 82% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1771.0 1977.66487455 90% => OK
No of words: 359.0 407.700716846 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.93314763231 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35284910392 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00301289572 2.67179642975 112% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 212.727598566 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.487465181058 0.524837075471 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 552.6 618.680645161 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 7.0 1.86738351254 375% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.8109020383 48.9658058833 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.066666667 100.406767564 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.9333333333 20.6045352989 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.06666666667 5.45110844103 148% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.186157279892 0.236089414692 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0723054796264 0.076458572812 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0808642186908 0.0737576698707 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.149968648293 0.150856017488 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0764188978871 0.0645574589148 118% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 11.7677419355 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 58.1214874552 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.61 10.9000537634 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.38 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 86.8835125448 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.002688172 120% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.