Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? To improve the quality of education, universities should spend more money on salaries for university professors. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
In this case we cannot guarantee that if the universities spent more money on salaries for university professors will improve the quality of education. I have two specific reason for this, and hence I would like to disagree the statement.
Let's look at some of the aspects if university takes this action to improve the quality of education.
Firstly, we all know that quality of education is not totally dependent upon the professors spending money in their salaries won't seems the appropriate way, and even if they done then professors will improve their financial life and not the student’s education. if university wants to do this change, they should design a new study pattern for the students so that they can give more focus on studies can make their life easy. with this change we can make a big difference in the routine students used to follow and build their personal skill too, and that too with saving a lot of money that university were going to spend on salaries for the professors.
Second resone for not to support the given idea is spending money can degrade the quality of education system if professors get attracted to the money there can be chances that would not much attention to the students. university should focus on the curriculum activities like whether that are going in planned manor or not, or every class teacher should create a study pattern for the students so that they can follow it thoroughly can avoid other distraction which can help them to focus more on studies.
Hence, I feel this rather spending more money on salaries.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-02-02 | rodriannnn | 76 | view |
| 2022-12-11 | subashdevkota | 81 | view |
| 2022-10-20 | pativ7 | 76 | view |
| 2022-08-24 | Hello GRE | 76 | view |
| 2022-06-05 | Maryam Madson | 73 | view |
- Some parents forbid young children from owning smart phones cell phones with Internet access while others disagree and believe that they are important tools for keeping in touch Which point of view do you think is better and why 73
- Scandals are useful because they focus our attention on problems in ways that no speaker or reformer ever could 50
- Claim Many problems of modern society cannot be solved by laws and the legal system Reason Laws cannot change what is in people s hearts or minds 50
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Life today is easier and more comfortable than it was when your grandparents were children Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 60
- Scandals are useful because they focus our attention on problems in ways that no speaker or reformer ever could 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: LETS_LET[1]
Message: Did you mean 'Let's'?
Suggestion: Let's
... would like to disagree the statement. Lets look at some of the aspects if universi...
^^^^
Line 2, column 14, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...o disagree the statement. Lets look at some of the aspects if university takes this action...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 263, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: If
...l life and not the student’s education. if university wants to do this change, the...
^^
Line 4, column 428, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: With
...us on studies can make their life easy. with this change we can make a big differenc...
^^^^
Line 6, column 220, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: University
...uld not much attention to the students. university should focus on the curriculum activiti...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, hence, if, look, second, so, then, i feel
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 15.1003584229 33% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 9.8082437276 163% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 43.0788530466 70% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 52.1666666667 59% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1311.0 1977.66487455 66% => OK
No of words: 270.0 407.700716846 66% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.85555555556 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05360046442 4.48103885553 90% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52234186914 2.67179642975 94% => OK
Unique words: 140.0 212.727598566 66% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.518518518519 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 412.2 618.680645161 67% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 20.6003584229 44% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 20.1344086022 149% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 76.5135346697 48.9658058833 156% => OK
Chars per sentence: 145.666666667 100.406767564 145% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.0 20.6045352989 146% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.33333333333 5.45110844103 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 11.8709677419 42% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.379790968125 0.236089414692 161% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.164692615098 0.076458572812 215% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0619196676362 0.0737576698707 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.206987870955 0.150856017488 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0891642064779 0.0645574589148 138% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 11.7677419355 140% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.49 58.1214874552 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.1575268817 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.5 10.9000537634 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.99 8.01818996416 100% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 86.8835125448 56% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 10.002688172 145% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.0537634409 139% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.