Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
To improve the quality of education, universities should spend more money on salaries for university professors.
Higher education quality has always been one of the most controversial subjects, which often provoke many discussions. Some people keep endorsing the claim that paying high salaries to university professors positively affect quality of education whereas others dismiss this idea. As matter of fact, my firm conviction is that increasing professors’ salary can help to improve education condition. In what fallows, I will thoroughly elucidate what rationales my perspective is based on.
The first and the foremost reason is that money has always been among the most impressive and motivational factors which indirectly stimulate people to get their task done in better and more responsibly. Indeed, if people receive more money for their job, they better feel the sense of gratuity. To delineate, the more you pay someone, the more you respect their endeavor. When Professors earn higher salary, they will sense the value of their work has been comprehended and universities appreciate them adequately. As the consequence, professors have been mentally satisfied and this sense of being valuable and verification stimulate them to dedicate themselves more to the education of their students. It is an undisputable fact that ungrateful behavior, especially financially which is a significant factor in all careers, from university will discourage and despond professors.
The second pivotal vindicating point I should mention here is that the amount of salary is among the most appealing factors in whole professions. In fact, higher salary will encourage more educated people to evolve in the science committee of universities and work as professors instead of preferring to work in other areas which are more profitable. My brother’s experience as a highly educated person is a compelling example of this assertation. Actually, my brother was a well-known scientist which had a PhD degree in biology, and was invited to teach in the university of our city. However, the proposed salary was too low that could hardly cover his family’s expenses. Consequently, he preferred to work in a laboratory which could pay him more feasible money and fulfill his demands.
To put in a nutshell, money play a determining role in universities success and benefiting higher quality because money can provide the sense of gratefulness for professors and motivate them to purely teach students, and dedicate their time to instructing. Furthermore, universities can attract more scientific and well-educated individuals by proposing more money than other professions in other areas, for instance industry, which pay higher salary.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-02-02 | rodriannnn | 76 | view |
| 2022-12-11 | subashdevkota | 81 | view |
| 2022-10-20 | pativ7 | 76 | view |
| 2022-08-24 | Hello GRE | 76 | view |
| 2022-06-05 | Maryam Madson | 73 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Visiting museums is the best way to learn about a country Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 76
- Amtrak intercity train service 76
- salvage logging 80
- whether traveling to local cities is fruitful or to foreign countries 90
- summarize the points made in passage and the lecture. 3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 487, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... rationales my perspective is based on. The first and the foremost reason is tha...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, consequently, first, furthermore, however, if, second, so, well, whereas, as to, for instance, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 43.0788530466 81% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 52.1666666667 84% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.0752688172 161% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2222.0 1977.66487455 112% => OK
No of words: 404.0 407.700716846 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.5 4.8611393121 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48327461151 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07047646195 2.67179642975 115% => OK
Unique words: 219.0 212.727598566 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.542079207921 0.524837075471 103% => OK
syllable_count: 708.3 618.680645161 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.51630824373 119% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.0727602899 48.9658058833 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.444444444 100.406767564 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4444444444 20.6045352989 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.22222222222 5.45110844103 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.300774432995 0.236089414692 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0928511728759 0.076458572812 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0560226268873 0.0737576698707 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.191749024034 0.150856017488 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0242875273913 0.0645574589148 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 11.7677419355 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 58.1214874552 55% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.1575268817 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.92 10.9000537634 137% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.46 8.01818996416 118% => OK
difficult_words: 121.0 86.8835125448 139% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.002688172 120% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.