Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?It is better to have one or two close friends than to have a large number of casual acquaintances.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
friendship has a tremendous impact on our progress and well-being. In fact, it can enhance our success in immeasurable ways because it encompasses our core values. Therefore, I had rather have one or two close friends than to have a large number of casual acquaintances.
First and foremost, with a typical friend, people can share any thought and tell secret without any concern that they would misunderstand them. Besides, a close friend can directly know what their friend intents, and can encourage them for the right things, or stop them if there was something wrong. Needless to say, a close friend always holds their friend's back, particularly when people were so confused to make something special. On the other hand, if a person who has no friend, and has many relatives, he might attain good advice, but it might be out- date ideas or not goes with the same way that he thinks, while if the same person gets advice from his friend, it might be going precisely with what he wants. Consequently, choosing a close friend has a remarkable impact on people life because friendship helps people to share their thought and get more relevant to their way of thinking.
A second exquisite point to mention here is that close friends have a high chance to be at the same age, which means that they might share the same interest and the same things that love to do it together. In other words, casual acquaintances might be in different age range, so everyone has his interest and might be so difficult to share it with others from other generation. For example, teenagers have a high range of curiosity; they might try anything that they want. In contrast, a relative for them do not have the same curiosity, so they would not show the same eager to try it like a close friend. so, it is better to have a friend than a relative because friends at the same age would have the same ideas rather than a relative people.
Due to the aforementioned. I adamantly prefer to have one or two close friends than to have a large number of casual acquaintances.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-07-03 | Bassem Tadros | 76 | view |
| 2019-06-29 | toefl2012 | 88 | view |
- TPO-09 - Independent Writing TaskDo you agree or disagree with the following statement?Technology has made children less creative than they were in the past.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- TPO 46-Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific points made in the reading passage. 68
- TPO-06 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Life today is easier and more comfortable than it was when your grandparents were children.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is better to have one or two close friends than to have a large number of casual acquaintances Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 88
- Essay topics: TPO-47 - Independent Writing TaskDo you agree or disagree with the following statement?It is important to know about events happening around the world, even if it is unlikely that they will affect your daily life. 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Friendship
friendship has a tremendous impact on our progress...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 189, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'had'.
Suggestion: had
...ur core values. Therefore, I had rather have one or two close friends than to have a...
^^^^
Line 1, column 232, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...e one or two close friends than to have a large number of casual acquaintances. First and f...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... large number of casual acquaintances. First and foremost, with a typical frien...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 903, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...more relevant to their way of thinking. A second exquisite point to mention here...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 610, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: So
...me eager to try it like a close friend. so, it is better to have a friend than a r...
^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... ideas rather than a relative people. Due to the aforementioned. I adamantly p...
^^^
Line 4, column 96, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...e one or two close friends than to have a large number of casual acquaintances.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, consequently, first, if, second, so, therefore, well, while, for example, in contrast, in fact, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 9.8082437276 143% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 43.0788530466 86% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 52.1666666667 73% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1690.0 1977.66487455 85% => OK
No of words: 363.0 407.700716846 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.65564738292 4.8611393121 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3649236973 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6009769927 2.67179642975 97% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 212.727598566 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.479338842975 0.524837075471 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 521.1 618.680645161 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.825013576 48.9658058833 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.666666667 100.406767564 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.2 20.6045352989 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.53333333333 5.45110844103 175% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.5376344086 144% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.261784286129 0.236089414692 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113142828777 0.076458572812 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.148375355433 0.0737576698707 201% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.23323378301 0.150856017488 155% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.127833469713 0.0645574589148 198% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 11.7677419355 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 58.1214874552 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.04 10.9000537634 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.13 8.01818996416 89% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 86.8835125448 61% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.