Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? For the successful development of a country, it is more important for a government to spend money on the education of very young children (five to ten years old) than to spend money on universities. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
The children who known as a country’s wealth, plays a significant role in the advancing progress of a country. In fact, they ascertain the countries future. While, some group mentions to universities importance to enhance the level of a country on the industrial and economical field, others highlight the children’s role for a country. I support the idea that the government should pay more attention to the children education base on three points, the importance of the childhood in the adult success, the easier formation of a child mind and thoughts and it is logical economically.
First of all, the future of a person determines in childhood period and every costs that spend in childhood will have multiple times profits. Some group mentions to adults that the government should specify advance facilities and money to advocate them of course a moderate budget will be sufficient for rudimentary education system, while others critic them due to researches’ outcomes that depict the importance of the children education. Because children with all things that have learned and educated in the childhood enters to society and universities. In the other words, complex education with high economical support means more adults with less problem. Therefore, the costs and problems which the adult can make for governments will be decrease dramatically. Japan is an acceptable example to clarify this points which could modify the country’s level in the economical and industrial field with more attention for children instead of high notice to universities and the result is a high advanced country.
Secondly, the brain capacity is incomparable among children and adults such a way that children’s mind is like a white paper that teachers can form them. Some arguments are presented from some group that universities due to its’ role in the industrial field and have direct relationship with government should take high budget but with comparing their ideas with reality it can be concluded that If the more facilities and resourceful material will access, the result will be more sufficient than adult. Furthermore, these children will be manage the universities as professors, students and employees. For instance, a research which started to determine the amount of efficiency among children and adult, proved the positive effects of this point. Therefore, the high level rudimentary schools create high level universities and effect the country as an advance country.
Thirdly, the costs which spend for children will protect the country from huge problem and additional costs in the futures. It means that efficiency of the money spent will reduce the burden on the government from extra costs. According to the mentioned point can be convince the critics who tries to show the university more important than rudimentary educational system.
Consequently, I am in favor of the spending more money and more attention to children’s education due to its importance in the country’s future base on three points, the positive effect in the future, high rate of children’s influence plus reduce the governments costs in the future.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-27 | SSN775 | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-27 | SSN775 | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-13 | dentista1985 | 60 | view |
| 2020-01-12 | nusybah | 70 | view |
| 2019-12-25 | Armin Azad | 81 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Leadership comes naturally: one cannot learn to be a leader. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? When teachers assign projects on which students must work together, the students learn much more effectively than they are asked to work alone on projects. Use specific reasons and examples to support 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the statement? Young people today have no influence on the important decisions that determine the future of society as a whole. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
- TPO32-integrated 88
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? For the successful development of a country, it is more important for a government to spend money on the education of very young children (five to ten years old) than to spend money on universities. U 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The children who known as a country&apos...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 19, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a known'.
Suggestion: who is a known
The children who known as a country's wealth, plays a sig...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ghts and it is logical economically. First of all, the future of a person det...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 618, Rule ID: ECONOMICAL_ECONOMIC[1]
Message: Did you mean 'economic' (=connected with economy)?
Suggestion: economic
...ther words, complex education with high economical support means more adults with less pro...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...he result is a high advanced country. Secondly, the brain capacity is incompar...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t the country as an advance country. Thirdly, the costs which spend for child...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...than rudimentary educational system. Consequently, I am in favor of the spend...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, furthermore, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, third, thirdly, while, for instance, in fact, of course, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 9.8082437276 163% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 13.8261648746 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.0286738351 145% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 43.0788530466 58% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 52.1666666667 115% => OK
Nominalization: 22.0 8.0752688172 272% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2689.0 1977.66487455 136% => OK
No of words: 498.0 407.700716846 122% => OK
Chars per words: 5.39959839357 4.8611393121 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.72397222731 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0388320536 2.67179642975 114% => OK
Unique words: 222.0 212.727598566 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.44578313253 0.524837075471 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 822.6 618.680645161 133% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 11.0 3.08781362007 356% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.1344086022 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 81.8592468087 48.9658058833 167% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.526315789 100.406767564 141% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.2105263158 20.6045352989 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.63157894737 5.45110844103 140% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.5376344086 126% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.240394049002 0.236089414692 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0812484682284 0.076458572812 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0413801436442 0.0737576698707 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.161469730624 0.150856017488 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0342492814403 0.0645574589148 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.1 11.7677419355 145% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 58.1214874552 63% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.1575268817 144% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.34 10.9000537634 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.57 8.01818996416 107% => OK
difficult_words: 115.0 86.8835125448 132% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.0537634409 123% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.247311828 146% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.