Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Teachers should not make their social or political views known to students in the classroom. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.

Essay topics:

Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?

Teachers should not make their social or political views known to students in the classroom.

Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.

Submitted by Dozer on Wed, 01/03/2018 - 13:12

People have been arguing a lot whether or not pedagogues should present to students their social and political beliefs. I think that knowing teachers` points of view on this matter in beneficial for young people and can shape their future lives. I feel this way for two main reasons, which I will explore in the following essay.
First of all, by listening to different points of view on political and social aspects of life children can decide which one is more suitable for them personally. Students have many teachers in school and if each professor expresses his opinion about the political situation in the world, pupils will learn from them and will obtain important knowledge. My own experience is a compelling example of this. When I was a senior, the political situation in my country was unstable. It was the time of great changes and citizens had to choose a candidate they would like to vote for in following presidential elections. I recall that many of my teachers were talking about their preferences and provided reasons to espouse their beliefs. Sometimes, during our lessons, we even disputed about which of the candidates was superior. The chatting helped me a lot to understand my country`s affairs and make a decision about who I wanted to see as a president. That is why I think it is advantageous for teenagers to have this kind of conversations in a classroom.
Secondly, when professors share with adolescents their views, they can engage the youth in the social life of their communities. These days, teenagers are more interested in technological devices than in the life of others. If a teacher explains to students why he thinks it is important to volunteer in hospitals, fire departments, or local libraries, he can encourage them to develop their towns. For instance, my history professor was an incredibly social person. Every weekend she volunteered at a local nursing home and assisted the staff in their working routine. Moreover, she founded a nonprofit charity organization to support families with disabled children. In a classroom, she often told her student how happy she was helping people and inspired us to do the same. In this way, many of my classmates and I followed her advice and started devoting out free time to social work.
In conclusion, I strongly believe that students should be aware of political and social preferences of their professors. This is because it can help them to create their personal points of view, and can benefit those who are around them

Votes
Average: 7.6 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2020-01-29 Chengke 66 view
2020-01-29 Chengke 60 view
2020-01-13 Somayya 73 view
2020-01-05 Raziya 73 view
2019-12-07 peymankaz 73 view
>>> More users practiced this topic >>>
Essay Categories
Independent TOEFL Writing
Essays by user Dozer :
>>> more essays by the user >>>

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 32, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: whether
People have been arguing a lot whether or not pedagogues should present to students t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...evoting out free time to social work. In conclusion, I strongly believe that stu...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, for instance, i feel, i think, in conclusion, kind of, talking about, first of all

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 61.0 43.0788530466 142% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 60.0 52.1666666667 115% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2105.0 1977.66487455 106% => OK
No of words: 423.0 407.700716846 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.97635933806 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.53508145475 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8621744625 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 232.0 212.727598566 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.548463356974 0.524837075471 105% => OK
syllable_count: 652.5 618.680645161 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 15.0 9.59856630824 156% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.7104754874 48.9658058833 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.6818181818 100.406767564 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2272727273 20.6045352989 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.68181818182 5.45110844103 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.223830627405 0.236089414692 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0620836251152 0.076458572812 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0449717148849 0.0737576698707 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.143586616703 0.150856017488 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00864543430962 0.0645574589148 13% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 11.7677419355 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 58.1214874552 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 10.9000537634 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.72 8.01818996416 109% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 86.8835125448 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.