Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Technology has made children less creative than they were in the past. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Do the technology decrease the creativity of children than the past? I absolutely disapprove this idea. The technology actually benefits their creativity and makes their dreams come true. Also, the technology had produced many modern jobs depend on creativity.
which take creativity to . Moreover, the world had been changed by technology, children now should be more creative than the past to compete with other people in the whole world.
There are many online tools to make people's idea into reality. For example, children now can design their own toys or tools by using three-dimension structure software to build their ideas and make them real by three-dimension printers. Children in the past are limited by the technology and cannot dream wild and big. Children's creativity now are benefited by the technology.
Many new types of jobs are flourishing credited to the advance of technology. Video producers, bloggers, and many workers are rely on the Internet. Those jobs need creativity the most and do not restrain the workers' age. Children now can be more creative than before since the more creative they are, the probability of more profits can appear.
The technology had shorten the distances between people around the world, living in different countries does not mean they are not competitors forever. The outstanding abilities include creativity. Children now are forced to be more creative and astounding since they are not only compete with inland people but outside their country. Technology brings chances and pressure to modern children simultaneously.
Technology has the power to manufacture children's creative concepts, generates modern jobs that never exist in the past, and compels people to be more creative for it had made the world more compress. Technology increase children's creativity in many ways. Children now are more lucky to have advanced technology compare to their parents. Meanwhile they need to work harder and think more creative to protrude from their peer.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-05-01 | aaronahmed | 3 | view |
| 2023-04-21 | sonyeoso | 76 | view |
| 2023-04-10 | Yam Kumar Oli | 66 | view |
| 2022-11-16 | anman | 87 | view |
| 2022-11-16 | anman | 73 | view |
- Dinosaurs as Endotherm Animals 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Television advertising directed towards young children aged two to five should not be allowed Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Governments should spend more money in support of the arts than in support of athletics such as state sponsored Olympic teams Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 60
- Every year forest fires and severe storms cause a great deal of damage to forests in the northwestern United States One way of dealing with aftermath of these disasters is called salvage logging which is the practice of removing dead trees from affected a 76
- In the United States employees typically work five days a week for eight hours each day However many employees want to work a four day week and are willing to accept less pay in order to do so A mandatory policy requiring companies to offer their employee 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 262, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “which” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... many modern jobs depend on creativity. which take creativity to . Moreover, the worl...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 2, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Which
...any modern jobs depend on creativity. which take creativity to . Moreover, the worl...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 26, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...n creativity. which take creativity to . Moreover, the world had been changed by...
^^
Line 4, column 126, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'relied'.
Suggestion: relied
...oducers, bloggers, and many workers are rely on the Internet. Those jobs need creati...
^^^^
Line 5, column 20, Rule ID: HAD_VBP[1]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'shortened'.
Suggestion: shortened
...profits can appear. The technology had shorten the distances between people around the...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 20, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'shortened'.
Suggestion: shortened
...profits can appear. The technology had shorten the distances between people around the...
^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 201, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...or it had made the world more compress. Technology increase childrens creativity in many w...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 338, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Meanwhile,
...ed technology compare to their parents. Meanwhile they need to work harder and think more...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, if, moreover, so, while, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 11.0286738351 18% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 43.0788530466 39% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 52.1666666667 82% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 8.0752688172 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1690.0 1977.66487455 85% => OK
No of words: 316.0 407.700716846 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.34810126582 4.8611393121 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21620550194 4.48103885553 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77012564968 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 212.727598566 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.518987341772 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 528.3 618.680645161 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 9.59856630824 21% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 4.94265232975 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.1344086022 70% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.8795679551 48.9658058833 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 76.8181818182 100.406767564 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.3636363636 20.6045352989 70% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.59090909091 5.45110844103 48% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.53405017921 132% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 8.0 5.5376344086 144% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.227620895693 0.236089414692 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0811371667357 0.076458572812 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0737393753051 0.0737576698707 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139280824033 0.150856017488 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0305602834802 0.0645574589148 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 11.7677419355 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 48.81 58.1214874552 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.16 10.9000537634 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.23 8.01818996416 103% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 86.8835125448 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.0537634409 76% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.