Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? when teachers assign projects on which students must work together, the students learn much more effectively than when they are asked to work alone on their projects.
It goes without saying that one of the most important parts of studying at schools is doing projects and homework. These projects help the students to understand the concepts more thoroughly. The question occupying the mind is that whether it is better for students to do the projects in a group of several people or individually. From my vantage point, working on projects in a group can be much more beneficial for the students to learn effectively. In the following essay, I will pinpoint the most important reasons for holding this notion.
First, since working in a group involves different students, poor students can get the help of good students and the good students by helping their friends would become master with that course. Through group activities, the students are able to ask their questions and solve their problems. They can even become more productive and do the project more readily through brainstorming. To provide an example, a programme was introduced to the schools in Iran to apply to the students' projects. According to the programme, each project given to the students should be divided into two parts, one of which should be done individually and the other in a group of two or three students. The results were outstanding. One of the results showed that students' have done better on the group projects in comparison to the individually done projects and they have learned more through the group project.
Second, It is crystal clear that everybody enjoys groups' activities. Since humans are social creatures, they are more productive and effective when they are acting as a part of a group. Students project is just the same. Through doing the project in groups each individual's self-confidence will increase and they will feel productive. Besides, they can obtain many valuable skills such as social skills, the skill to work in a group, and even the skill to be a good leader of a group. Furthermore, during doing the project with their friends, students become less exhausted and they would have fun besides learning new things. For instance, another result of the programme held in Iran illustrated that students liked the group activity more than the part which they had to do alone because they found it more fun.
To wrap it up, I firmly believe that students can gain a lot of benefits through group activities and it is the best to assign them projects on which they have to work together. I myself found my group projects during school really fun and educational which even helped me to increase my self-esteem.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-19 | mashghanbar | 60 | view |
| 2020-01-09 | liviapabreu | 70 | view |
| 2020-01-09 | liviapabreu | 60 | view |
| 2020-01-07 | Shiimaaa | 76 | view |
| 2020-01-07 | Shiimaaa | 76 | view |
- Some people think that older children should be required to take care of the younger children Others think that this should be done by parents or other adults Which do you prefer 83
- TPO2-task1 3
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? when teachers assign projects on which students must work together, the students learn much more effectively than when they are asked to work alone on their projects. 70
- TPO33-Integrated 73
- TPO33-task2 3
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, furthermore, if, really, second, so, for instance, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 43.0788530466 88% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 52.1666666667 117% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2130.0 1977.66487455 108% => OK
No of words: 431.0 407.700716846 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94199535963 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55637350225 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66982701136 2.67179642975 100% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 212.727598566 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.466357308585 0.524837075471 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 622.8 618.680645161 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.94265232975 202% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.6706995342 48.9658058833 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.428571429 100.406767564 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5238095238 20.6045352989 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.52380952381 5.45110844103 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 11.8709677419 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.348907220184 0.236089414692 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.111234319639 0.076458572812 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0657006465098 0.0737576698707 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.223334815757 0.150856017488 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0412581151483 0.0645574589148 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 11.7677419355 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 58.1214874552 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.1575268817 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.37 10.9000537634 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.45 8.01818996416 93% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 86.8835125448 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.