Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
For the successful development of a country, it is more important for a government to spend money on the education of very young children (five to ten years old) than to spend money on universities.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Obviously, education is typically considered to be an exceptionally important way to achieve the development goal of a country, especially in developing countries, like China. Personally, I think the education of university students is more significant than that of very young children.
First, students in universities are at their golden stage when they have not only the most opinions but also the best creativity. At this period of ages, a wide variety of subjects and activities are demanded for them to develop interests and stimulate talents. For example, mathematics can promote their ability of thinking logically, while art exhibitions can establish their deep understanding about beautiful things, etc. All of these different fields work together to shape a great young generation, which makes the main power of exploring the bright future of a country. Thus, it is necessary for a government to spend enough money on supporting the cultivation of university students.
Second, students in universities can create value for the society immediately after their graduation, whereas very young children cannot do it, the investment in whom is a very long-term process to get profits. After getting their bachelor degrees, some young people go into various companies and plants where they make contributions to their countries. Besides, a lot of them choose to seek for advanced degrees in universities or institutions. Generally, these young scientists invent novel technologies which can improve the productivity, as well as explore deep science which can help people understand the world. Therefore, a government has the incumbent responsibility to provide a large amount of funding for them to make values.
Granted, the education of very young children is also pretty indispensable, that may determine their future performance in high schools and even colleges. However, I do not think a government has to devote more to them than universities. After all, university students can volunteer to assist these young children in their communities with their mental and physical health. In this way, these young people at different ages can get the best cultivation.
In conclusion, from the perspectives of developmental stages and the payback from the investment, it is wise to provide more funding for university students than very little children. Futhermore, it can foster the cultivation of university students as well as those young children.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-27 | SSN775 | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-27 | SSN775 | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-13 | dentista1985 | 60 | view |
| 2020-01-12 | nusybah | 70 | view |
| 2019-12-25 | Armin Azad | 81 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.Parents today are more involved in their children's education than parents were in the past. 60
- TPO 46Question:Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The opinions of celebrities, such as famous entertainers and athletes, are more important to younger people than they are to old 88
- Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer Do you agree or disagree with the following statement In the past young people depended too much on their parents to make decisions for them today young people are better able to make decisions abou 88
- Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? In the past, young people depended too much on their parents to make decisions for them; today young people are better able to make decisions a 83
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Famous entertainers and athletes deserve to have more privacy than they have now Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 82
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 139, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...evelopment goal of a country, especially in developing countries, like China. Per...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, however, if, may, second, so, therefore, thus, well, whereas, while, after all, as to, for example, i think, in conclusion, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 15.1003584229 60% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 30.0 43.0788530466 70% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 52.1666666667 100% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.0752688172 198% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2099.0 1977.66487455 106% => OK
No of words: 380.0 407.700716846 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.52368421053 4.8611393121 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41515443553 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11538937687 2.67179642975 117% => OK
Unique words: 213.0 212.727598566 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.560526315789 0.524837075471 107% => OK
syllable_count: 648.9 618.680645161 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.7892062492 48.9658058833 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.611111111 100.406767564 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1111111111 20.6045352989 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.94444444444 5.45110844103 164% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 11.8709677419 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.240542577682 0.236089414692 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0823305756532 0.076458572812 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0601947534806 0.0737576698707 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.145605312417 0.150856017488 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0275024931218 0.0645574589148 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 11.7677419355 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 58.1214874552 72% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.1575268817 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.74 10.9000537634 135% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.0 8.01818996416 112% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 86.8835125448 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.002688172 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.247311828 146% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.