Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?In the past, young people depended too much on their parents to make decisions for them; today young people are better able to makedecisions about their own lives. Use specific reasons and examples to

Essay topics:

Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?

In the past, young people depended too much on their parents to make decisions for them; today young people are better able to make

decisions about their own lives. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.

Due to the increase in civilization, the modern world is a place of making an individual decision. There is numerous difference between the young people of the past and present era. However, a plethora of people contents that young people did not depend on their parents in the past but others disagree with the statement. Not surprisingly, the number of controversies over this issue is overwhelmed. Among this controversy, I personally believe that young people are more independent in the present days than in the past. I feel this way for several reasons I will expound in the subsequent followings.

To commence with, in the modern era young people can make their own's decision even a five years old kid has a choice. This is because of the rapid growth of education. Young people are now more realistic and understanding but in the past, they depend on parents because of lack of knowledge. They through that parents know better and try to obey every decision. But, today's generation is more advanced and they make their own decision. Besides, parents also respect children's decision and trust them. My personal experience is a compelling example of this. Before admitting to a university, I was interested in engineering but my father chose a simple subject for my better future. But, I realized to him that I was good at math and science, so I could handle this field. He perceived my point and appreciated my decision.

The exquisite point is that today's society is free from superstitions but in the past, it was one of the cause for holding young people. Now, the world is more technologically advanced because of internet, telephone, social media etc. Young people can get information from those sources and can perceive profound knowledge which makes them more understandable. On the other hand, the only source of knowledge of young people in the past was parents, relatives or neighbour. Thus, they needed parents to make a decision. For instance, I heard from my grandmother that when she was young she chose a Muslim boy for marrying, but that time society was so conservative that their parents forced to break the relation and told that getting married with another religion is a curse of God.

To recapitulate, young children are now more independent because of the change of social norm, education and the growth of technology. Besides, parents support and trusting also changes the situation.

Votes
Average: 7 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2020-01-29 nusybah 80 view
2020-01-16 3dra 60 view
2020-01-10 Opak Pulup 70 view
2020-01-10 Opak Pulup 70 view
2020-01-08 naziii 76 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user Seema Modak :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 29, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'todays'' or 'today's'?
Suggestion: todays'; today's
...sion. The exquisite point is that todays society is free from superstitions but ...
^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, however, if, so, thus, for instance, i feel, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 13.8261648746 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 45.0 43.0788530466 104% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 52.1666666667 107% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.0752688172 161% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2028.0 1977.66487455 103% => OK
No of words: 405.0 407.700716846 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.00740740741 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48604634366 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83505394379 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 209.0 212.727598566 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.516049382716 0.524837075471 98% => OK
syllable_count: 624.6 618.680645161 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 45.1700490738 48.9658058833 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.5 100.406767564 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.875 20.6045352989 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.41666666667 5.45110844103 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.342581342793 0.236089414692 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0927533565435 0.076458572812 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0904717339559 0.0737576698707 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.200574805199 0.150856017488 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0898324282688 0.0645574589148 139% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 11.7677419355 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 58.1214874552 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.1575268817 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.48 10.9000537634 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.78 8.01818996416 97% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 86.8835125448 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.