do you agree or disagree with the following statements?
Technology has made children less creative than they were in the past .
use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Scientific progression is dynamic, one innovation leads to another and yet another. There has been a succession of inventions in the past, which has blessed humans with a plethora of benefits. Even though the technology is serving children at various stages of life, but to assume that recent developments have ruined the creativity of the children is irrational.
The soaring improvements in science and technology have ensured that the new generation is endowed with far more facilities than in the past. For example computers, television and the internet have become an important part of studies and daily life. In the past when students had the assignment to complete the only library was the option. Students had to go through various books to collect the required material. But these days everything available on the internet and children instead of using their ideas likes to copy from Wikipedia and other online sites. Therefore students are reaping the benefits of the technology.
However, there are many subjects where it is not possible to directly copy from the online media. To cite an example, art is all the handwork, and children have to use their creativity. Moreover, even schools and colleges have websites to check plagiarism. Thus, students can not copy the online available study material. Children are still using their brain to complete the projects and assignments. Along with it, it has been seen that children at a very young age are doing researches and come up with new ideas in science and technology. These kinds of un-expecting results are all because of the accessibility of the advances in education through technology.
To conclude, the stupendous improvements in technology is serving the man to no end. It is not true that all the work can be done by machines and technological gadgets. Children have there struggled in the studies and they are using their creativity in every subject.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-05-01 | aaronahmed | 3 | view |
| 2023-04-21 | sonyeoso | 76 | view |
| 2023-04-10 | Yam Kumar Oli | 66 | view |
| 2022-11-16 | anman | 87 | view |
| 2022-11-16 | anman | 73 | view |
- do you agree or disagree with the following statements people today spend too much time on personal enjoyment doing things they like to do rather than doing things they should do Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 60
- summaries the point made in the lecture 3
- Television advertising directed towards young children should not be allowed do agree or disagree 76
- do you agree or disagree with the following statements Technology has made children less creative than they were in the past use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 70
- life is easier and more comfortable than it was when your grandparents were children do you agree or disagree 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 562, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
... from Wikipedia and other online sites. Therefore students are reaping the benefits of th...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, moreover, so, still, therefore, thus, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 9.8082437276 20% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 43.0788530466 35% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 52.1666666667 92% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1614.0 1977.66487455 82% => OK
No of words: 315.0 407.700716846 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.12380952381 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21286593061 4.48103885553 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81940509674 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 212.727598566 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.539682539683 0.524837075471 103% => OK
syllable_count: 512.1 618.680645161 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 9.59856630824 31% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.7248695041 48.9658058833 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.9473684211 100.406767564 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.5789473684 20.6045352989 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.52631578947 5.45110844103 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.174884365789 0.236089414692 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0476777627279 0.076458572812 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0474979160871 0.0737576698707 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111517338288 0.150856017488 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0149795408652 0.0645574589148 23% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 11.7677419355 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 58.1214874552 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.12 10.9000537634 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.44 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 86.8835125448 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.002688172 120% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.