Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Young people nowadays do not give enough time to helping their communities.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
People`s lives are in a mutual relationship with their communities. Each one of us knows that humans survival is dependent to their contribution in hard situation. If we look at the past catastrophic happenings on humans, we can see that they are very affectionate about each other. Also, we can not divide people into young and old and evaluating the amount of help in these situations. Young people are one of the predominant parts of communities which can help other humans in the forllowing ways.
First, young people usually prefer to help their community by improving their skills. As we know, a community will not need help only in harsh situations. Young people will try to improve their skills in every aspects to help their communities. For instance, with the presence of new technologies, young people will prefer to designate their time on producing robots for helping people on harsh situations like disaster of flood. Some other will decidate their life to become a nurse or doctor to help people in other ways.
Second, young people have their own way of helping their communities. For example, they will try to dedicate some money for special NGO companies which are specialied in helping people. These companies know that which part of our community needs help and they will focus on them. Thus, young people can find better ways for helping their communities instead of dedicating time. By this theory, they can be beneficial for their society better.
Third, we are experiencing a hectic life nowadays and most of us do not have enough time with our family. Consequently, it is obvious that people think that young people will consider less time for their communities. But, as I mentioned earlier, we have some fabulous foundations nowadays which their first priority is helping and analyzing the needs of cpmmunities.
All in all, we can not say that communities are not precious for young people. The thing that is obvious is that new technologies and foundations are doing better in helping better for helping humans. Also, lots of young people are participating in voluntering jobs which can help our communities. Finally, both ways are beneficial and we should encourage more people to participate in these works and It is not good to devide society into young and old for helping together.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-29 | mucahit11 | 83 | view |
| 2020-01-26 | supergirl20 | 60 | view |
| 2020-01-26 | supergirl20 | 60 | view |
| 2020-01-24 | SSN775 | 76 | view |
| 2020-01-17 | naziii | 76 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 100, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'humans'' or 'human's'?
Suggestion: humans'; human's
... communities. Each one of us knows that humans survival is dependent to their contribu...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, finally, first, if, look, second, so, third, thus, for example, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 9.8082437276 163% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 47.0 43.0788530466 109% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 52.1666666667 96% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1943.0 1977.66487455 98% => OK
No of words: 387.0 407.700716846 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.02067183463 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43534841618 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74210493504 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 212.727598566 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.457364341085 0.524837075471 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 587.7 618.680645161 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.1173465482 48.9658058833 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.3181818182 100.406767564 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5909090909 20.6045352989 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.59090909091 5.45110844103 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.271876573821 0.236089414692 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106331076161 0.076458572812 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0672750017088 0.0737576698707 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.184848312927 0.150856017488 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0522685600833 0.0645574589148 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 11.7677419355 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 58.1214874552 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.1575268817 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.54 10.9000537634 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.42 8.01818996416 93% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 86.8835125448 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.