Do you agree or disagree To improve the quality of education universities should spend more money on salaries for university professors

Essay topics:

Do you agree or disagree? To improve the quality of education, universities should spend more money on salaries for university professors.

Every professor has played key role in university to imrpove the academic level of society. Today, inflation is growing fast and everyone needs more money than before. Professore should be payed enough because of two reasons which I will explore in the next paragraphs.
First and foremost, every one, who is a professor today, has had a long journy and it makes him desire to have a good salary. If they felt satisfy with their salary, they would not try to find better place in companies instead of universities. Universities need more to intrigue them becuase of their academic impacts. As an instance, one of my professor in university, who is a great scholar, changed his job to be a manager of a company. Because, the company satisfied him with much more money than university gave him that year. As a result, my university lost one of the best leading scholar in the computer science. If he was payed enough by university, he had never changed his job.
Second, being a teacher at a university needs to being update by doing research, which is took a lot of time. Most of the professors spend most of their time in the libraries and labratuars. These times is not calculated for their salary. With the more and more money they give, they would spend more and more time for research. They will be enhanced the academic level of university by this concentration. For an instance, one of my professors, who focus on the new hightech style of lightening, spent most of his time in the library. He was payed as much as others, after a while he had to find part time job. As a result, he had not enough time for complete that research and it has taken a long time without any result. One day I saw him very tired and disappointed. If he was gotten enough salary, he would be able to finish his research and as a result, enhanced academic level of university.
In conclusion, allocating more money for professors by universities not only save them for countinunig their job as a university teacher but also, improve the academic level of university. Also, they are desire to pay more becuase of long journy that they have in their education life.

Votes
Average: 6 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-02-02 rodriannnn 76 view
2022-12-11 subashdevkota 81 view
2022-10-20 pativ7 76 view
2022-08-24 Hello GRE 76 view
2022-06-05 Maryam Madson 73 view
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 440, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...d his job to be a manager of a company. Because, the company satisfied him with much mo...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 91, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'taken'.
Suggestion: taken
...eing update by doing research, which is took a lot of time. Most of the professors s...
^^^^
Line 3, column 203, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[4]
Message: You should probably use: 'are'.
Suggestion: are
...e libraries and labratuars. These times is not calculated for their salary. With t...
^^
Line 3, column 597, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled with hyphen.
Suggestion: part-time
...as others, after a while he had to find part time job. As a result, he had not enough tim...
^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, second, so, while, in conclusion, as a result

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 42.0 43.0788530466 97% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 52.1666666667 90% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1768.0 1977.66487455 89% => OK
No of words: 382.0 407.700716846 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.62827225131 4.8611393121 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.42095241839 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65693781436 2.67179642975 99% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 212.727598566 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.458115183246 0.524837075471 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 585.9 618.680645161 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.51792114695 199% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.6070806911 48.9658058833 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 80.3636363636 100.406767564 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.3636363636 20.6045352989 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.04545454545 5.45110844103 56% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 12.0 4.88709677419 246% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.244159302874 0.236089414692 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0757917116975 0.076458572812 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.074825038077 0.0737576698707 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.178770410866 0.150856017488 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0560771942372 0.0645574589148 87% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.1 11.7677419355 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 58.1214874552 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.1575268817 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.28 10.9000537634 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.37 8.01818996416 92% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 86.8835125448 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.