Imagine that you are in a classroom or a meeting. The teacher or the meeting leader says something incorrect in your opinion, which of the following is the best thing to do?
* Interrupt and correct the mistake right away
* Wait until the class or meeting is over and the people are gone, and then talk to the teacher or meeting leader
* Say nothing
In my opinion I would point out in the same meeting or during the class, the mistake made by the person right away. I feel this way for two main reasons that I will explain in the following essay.
First, I think it is important to state a correct concept if someone have said something I know is wrong. My personal experience is a compelling example of this. Approximately 10 years ago, I remember being in a history class and my teacher was talking about World War II. I noticed he said wrong a specific date. Moreover, he continued explaining the timeline of the facts based on this. When I noticed that something was wrong, I did not need to think so much, and I just rise my hand and told him he was confused the year and which was correct. As a result, all my classmates could learn properly the topic as well as my teacher was glad that I pointed out for him.
Second, it is a good way for the teacher or a boss could noticed you are aware of the lesson or the subject being discussed in the meeting. For instance, when I was working for a marketing business, I needed some feedback from my coworkers. The way I as leader, was able to know whereas they understand the presentation being exposed, occurred when one told me I was wrong. After that, everyone realized it was OK to talk out loud in a secure environment. Therefore, they assume it is correct to quickly discuss incorrect thoughts.
In conclusion, it is fine to tell a teacher or a group leader when they have made an error. This is because all the others present can correct the fail and because it allow having a respectful interchange of ideas.
- Some people believe that electing a constitutional assembly is the best way to address modifications to the constitution, while others believe that a group of experts should be responsible for this task. 73
- Imagine that you are in a classroom or a meeting. The teacher or the meeting leader says something incorrect in your opinion, which of the following is the best thing to do? * Interrupt and correct the mistake right away * Wait until the class or meeting 60
- President Piñera should be impeached. 76
- TPO-17In the past century, the steady growth of the human population and the corresponding increase in agriculture and pesticide use have caused much harm to wildlife in the United States—birds in particular. Unfortunately for birds, these trends are li 80
- State whether you agree or disagree with the statement. Then explain your reasons using specific details in your explanation. President Piñera should be impeached. 3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 70, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'someone' must be used with a third-person verb: 'has'.
Suggestion: has
...t to state a correct concept if someone have said something I know is wrong. My pers...
^^^^
Line 5, column 58, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'could' requires the base form of the verb: 'notice'
Suggestion: notice
...ood way for the teacher or a boss could noticed you are aware of the lesson or the subj...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 168, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'allows'?
Suggestion: allows
...ent can correct the fail and because it allow having a respectful interchange of idea...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, moreover, second, so, therefore, well, whereas, for instance, i feel, i think, in conclusion, talking about, as a result, as well as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 15.1003584229 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 46.0 43.0788530466 107% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 52.1666666667 50% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1327.0 1977.66487455 67% => OK
No of words: 300.0 407.700716846 74% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.42333333333 4.8611393121 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 4.48103885553 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5615338287 2.67179642975 96% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 212.727598566 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.57 0.524837075471 109% => OK
syllable_count: 412.2 618.680645161 67% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.5270755846 48.9658058833 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.9375 100.406767564 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.75 20.6045352989 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.875 5.45110844103 181% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 11.8709677419 42% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.135816714253 0.236089414692 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0435024411268 0.076458572812 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0529830847621 0.0737576698707 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.091436910482 0.150856017488 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0522469670377 0.0645574589148 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.8 11.7677419355 75% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 58.1214874552 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.1575268817 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.36 10.9000537634 77% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.48 8.01818996416 93% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 86.8835125448 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 10.002688172 60% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.