Imagine that you are in a classroom or a meeting. The teacher or the meeting leader says something incorrect In your opinion, which of the following is the best thing to do?
•Interrupt and correct the mistake right away.
•Wait until the class or meeting is over and the people are gone, and then talk to the teacher or meeting leader.
•Say nothing.
Several aspects must be taken into account to answer this question more precisely. Although meetings are the formal situations where the lecturer is superior to other participants in terms of knowledge, all meeting leaders are human beings and may make some errors. One of the heated debates in this realm is about the best reaction of an audience to these mistakes. However, there might be some counterexamples about this claim I would argue that a member of a meeting must be patient and tell the speaker about his mistake after the meeting is over. Following reasons will further elaborate on this issue.
The most prominent point to be mentioned is that we would not destroy a teacher or a meeting leader's reputation if we share the matter with them privately. However, we all know that to err is human, talking about a person's blunders in front of other people can weaken their standing. For instance, when I was a high school student, our teacher presented a lecture about recent discoveries of our solar system. She introduced a dwarf star as a planet. Suddenly, one of the students called out and interrupted the lecture to correct the teacher. In spite of the fact that he behaved like that unintentionally, not only the students but also the guests became disrupted. After the presentation, we all thought she is not informed enough, so we neglected the amazing parts of the lecture.
The second rationale behind my idea is rooted in the fact that making someone aware of a mistake is the best way to help them. In this regard, I believe that we should not ignore their mistake, and do not say anything, conversely; we must put our efforts to find a proper way to correct the speaker Take my previous example which can shed some light on this point. However, my classmate could have found a better solution to help our teacher I am sure that the teacher would not repeat this mistake anymore.
To wrap it up, based on the ideas which were presented above I strongly believe that we should feel responsible about mistakes which are made either by a teacher or by a meeting leader and try to notify them but in a more pleasant way.
- TPO11. Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Some people say that the Internet provides people with a lot of valuable information. Others think access to so much information creates problems. Which view do you agree with? 80
- TPO19.Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?In order to be well-informed, a person must get information from many different news resources. 97
- TPO24 83
- TPO17_Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Most advertisements make products seem much better than they really are. 90
- TPO26 – Independent: A/D? It is better for children to choose jobs that are similar to their parent's jobs than to choose jobs that very different from their parent's job. 80
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, conversely, however, if, may, second, so, for instance, talking about, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 9.8082437276 143% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 47.0 43.0788530466 109% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 52.1666666667 92% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1768.0 1977.66487455 89% => OK
No of words: 377.0 407.700716846 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.68965517241 4.8611393121 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4064143971 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57077761598 2.67179642975 96% => OK
Unique words: 212.0 212.727598566 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.562334217507 0.524837075471 107% => OK
syllable_count: 556.2 618.680645161 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.4437424664 48.9658058833 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.5 100.406767564 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5625 20.6045352989 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.8125 5.45110844103 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.170042441709 0.236089414692 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0518445856648 0.076458572812 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0463127729725 0.0737576698707 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108183639814 0.150856017488 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0250465147265 0.0645574589148 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 11.7677419355 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 58.1214874552 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.22 10.9000537634 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.09 8.01818996416 101% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 86.8835125448 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 78.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.